mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What, How, and When Should Object Detectors Update in Continually Changing Test Domains?

arXiv 2312.08875 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is a well-known fact that the performance of deep learning models deteriorates when they encounter a distribution shift at test time. Test-time adaptation (TTA) algorithms have been proposed to adapt the model online while inferring test data. However, existing research predominantly focuses on classification tasks through the optimization of batch normalization layers or classification heads, but this approach limits its applicability to various model architectures like Transformers and makes it challenging to apply to other tasks, such as object detection. In this paper, we propose a novel online adaption approach for object detection in continually changing test domains, considering which part of the model to update, how to update it, and when to perform the update. By introducing architecture-agnostic and lightweight adaptor modules and only updating these while leaving the pre-trained backbone unchanged, we can rapidly adapt to new test domains in an efficient way and prevent catastrophic forgetting. Furthermore, we present a practical and straightforward class-wise feature aligning method for object detection to resolve domain shifts. Additionally, we enhance efficiency by determining when the model is sufficiently adapted or when additional adaptation is needed due to changes in the test distribution. Our approach surpasses baselines on widely used benchmarks, achieving improvements of up to 4.9%p and 7.9%p in mAP for COCO rightarrow COCO-corrupted and SHIFT, respectively, while maintaining about 20 FPS or higher.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2023.

Builds on

44 of 51 references.

References · 44

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  8. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  9. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  10. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  11. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  12. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
32 more
  1. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  2. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  3. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  4. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  5. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  6. 2021End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection with Soft Teachercited by 315
  7. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 285
  8. 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 184
  9. 2020Unbiased Mean Teacher for Cross-domain Object Detectioncited by 158
  10. 2022SHIFT: A Synthetic Driving Dataset for Continuous Multi-Task Domain Adaptationcited by 146
  11. 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
  12. 2019A Robust Learning Approach to Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 109
  13. 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 102
  14. 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101
  15. 2019Self-Training and Adversarial Background Regularization for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 83
  16. 2020A Free Lunch for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Object Detection without Source Datacited by 79
  17. 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
  18. 2023Battle of the Backbones: A Large-Scale Comparison of Pretrained Models across Computer Vision Taskscited by 72
  19. 2019Automatic adaptation of object detectors to new domains using self-trainingcited by 66
  20. 2021MT3: Meta Test-Time Training for Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaptioncited by 65
  21. 2022A Broad Study of Pre-training for Domain Generalization and Adaptationcited by 64
  22. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
  23. 2019Physics-Based Rendering for Improving Robustness to Raincited by 49
  24. 2022Revisiting Realistic Test-Time Training: Sequential Inference and Adaptation by Anchored Clusteringcited by 44
  25. 2022A Probabilistic Framework for Lifelong Test-Time Adaptationcited by 44
  26. 2022ActMAD: Activation Matching to Align Distributions for Test-Time-Trainingcited by 38
  27. 2022Towards Online Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 36
  28. 2022TeST: Test-time Self-Training under Distribution Shiftcited by 29
  29. 2022CAFA: Class-Aware Feature Alignment for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 21
  30. 2023Energy-Based Test Sample Adaptation for Domain Generalizationcited by 14
  31. 2023STFAR: Improving Object Detection Robustness at Test-Time by Self-Training with Feature Alignment Regularizationcited by 12
  32. 2022TTAPS: Test-Time Adaption by Aligning Prototypes using Self-Supervisioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: