mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Critical concrete scenario generation using scenario-based falsification

arXiv 2208.13329 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2022cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous vehicles have the potential to lower the accident rate when compared to human driving. Moreover, it is the driving force of the automated vehicles' rapid development over the last few years. In the higher Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) automation level, the vehicle's and passengers' safety responsibility is transferred from the driver to the automated system, so thoroughly validating such a system is essential. Recently, academia and industry have embraced scenario-based evaluation as the complementary approach to road testing, reducing the overall testing effort required. It is essential to determine the system's flaws before deploying it on public roads as there is no safety driver to guarantee the reliability of such a system. This paper proposes a Reinforcement Learning (RL) based scenario-based falsification method to search for a high-risk scenario in a pedestrian crossing traffic situation. We define a scenario as risky when a system under testing (SUT) does not satisfy the requirement. The reward function for our RL approach is based on Intel's Responsibility Sensitive Safety(RSS), Euclidean distance, and distance to a potential collision.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.