BehAVExplor: Behavior Diversity Guided Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Testing Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs) is a critical task for ensuring the reliability and safety of autonomous vehicles. Existing methods mainly focus on searching for safety violations while the diversity of the generated test cases is ignored, which may generate many redundant test cases and failures. Such redundant failures can reduce testing performance and increase failure analysis costs. In this paper, we present a novel behavior-guided fuzzing technique (BehAVExplor) to explore the different behaviors of the ego vehicle (i.e., the vehicle controlled by the ADS under test) and detect diverse violations. Specifically, we design an efficient unsupervised model, called BehaviorMiner, to characterize the behavior of the ego vehicle. BehaviorMiner extracts the temporal features from the given scenarios and performs a clustering-based abstraction to group behaviors with similar features into abstract states. A new test case will be added to the seed corpus if it triggers new behaviors (e.g., cover new abstract states). Due to the potential conflict between the behavior diversity and the general violation feedback, we further propose an energy mechanism to guide the seed selection and the mutation. The energy of a seed quantifies how good it is. We evaluated BehAVExplor on Apollo, an industrial-level ADS, and LGSVL simulation environment. Empirical evaluation results show that BehAVExplor can effectively find more diverse violations than the state-of-the-art.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2024RoboTron-Drive: All-in-One Large Multimodal Model for Autonomous Drivingcited by 30
- 2024Efficient Domain Augmentation for Autonomous Driving Testing Using Diffusion Modelscited by 10
- 2023Domain Knowledge Distillation from Large Language Model: An Empirical Study in the Autonomous Driving Domaincited by 8
- 2024Decictor: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 4
- 2024Dance of the ADS: Orchestrating Failures through Historically-Informed Scenario Fuzzingcited by 2
- 2024Exploring Critical Testing Scenarios for Decision-Making Policies: An LLM Approachcited by 2
- 2025Simulator Ensembles for Trustworthy Autonomous Driving Systems Testingcited by 1
- 2025Argus: Resilience-Oriented Safety Assurance Framework for End-to-End ADSscited by 1
- 2024Natural Adversaries: Fuzzing Autonomous Vehicles with Realistic Roadside Object Placementscited by 0
- 2026ROMAN: Reward-Orchestrated Multi-Head Attention Network for Autonomous Driving System Testingcited by 0
- 2026TrafficAlign: Aligning Large Language Models for Traffic Scenario Generationcited by 0
- 2026TrafficAlign: Aligning Large Language Models for Traffic Scenario Generation27 Jun 2026
- 2026ROMAN: Reward-Orchestrated Multi-Head Attention Network for Autonomous Driving System Testing5 Feb 2026
- 2025Argus: Resilience-Oriented Safety Assurance Framework for End-to-End ADSs12 Nov 2025
- 2025Simulator Ensembles for Trustworthy Autonomous Driving Systems Testing11 Mar 2025
- 2024RoboTron-Drive: All-in-One Large Multimodal Model for Autonomous Driving10 Dec 2024
- 2024Exploring Critical Testing Scenarios for Decision-Making Policies: An LLM Approach9 Dec 2024
- 2024Efficient Domain Augmentation for Autonomous Driving Testing Using Diffusion Models20 Sep 2024
- 2024Natural Adversaries: Fuzzing Autonomous Vehicles with Realistic Roadside Object Placements13 Sep 2024
- 2024Dance of the ADS: Orchestrating Failures through Historically-Informed Scenario Fuzzing5 Jul 2024
- 2024Decictor: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving Systems28 Feb 2024
- 2023Domain Knowledge Distillation from Large Language Model: An Empirical Study in the Autonomous Driving Domain17 Jul 2023