From Next-Token to Mathematics: The Learning Dynamics of Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) solely trained on next-token prediction learn to solve a wide range of problems involving mathematical reasoning. But how does this ability evolve during training? We show the first analysis of how mathematical reasoning abilities of several open-weight LLMs develop during pre-training and post-training. To this end, we construct MathCAMPS, a synthetic dataset of novel mathematical reasoning problems grounded in 44 fine-grained skills taken from the Common Core curriculum from K to 8th grades. In one experiment, we show that mathematical skills are learned during pre-training in an order that measurably correlates with the human-designed curriculum, even though training data are randomly ordered. We also show a detailed analysis of which mathematical abilities benefit from instruction tuning, a widely used post-training method and, in contrast, which skills suffer. Our work paves the way for an empirical understanding of LLM training dynamics in relation to reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.
Builds on
4 of 24 references.
References · 4
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
- 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 153
- 2023LLM360: Towards Fully Transparent Open-Source LLMscited by 104
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024MathGAP: Out-of-Distribution Evaluation on Problems with Arbitrarily Complex Proofscited by 12
- 2026What do Language Models Learn and When? The Implicit Curriculum Hypothesiscited by 10
- 2024Mathfish: Evaluating Language Model Math Reasoning via Grounding in Educational Curriculacited by 5
- 2025A Matter of Interest: Understanding Interestingness of Math Problems in Humans and Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026Adaptive Problem Generation via Symbolic Representationscited by 0
- 2026LittleLearner: Language Models Under Pedagogically Controlled Knowledge Exposurecited by 0
- 2026LittleLearner: Language Models Under Pedagogically Controlled Knowledge Exposure13 Aug 2026
- 2026What do Language Models Learn and When? The Implicit Curriculum Hypothesis9 Apr 2026
- 2026Adaptive Problem Generation via Symbolic Representations22 Feb 2026
- 2025A Matter of Interest: Understanding Interestingness of Math Problems in Humans and Language Models11 Nov 2025
- 2024MathGAP: Out-of-Distribution Evaluation on Problems with Arbitrarily Complex Proofs17 Oct 2024
- 2024Mathfish: Evaluating Language Model Math Reasoning via Grounding in Educational Curricula8 Aug 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Advancing Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models: The Impact of Problem-Solving Data, Data Synthesis Methods, and Training Stages
- 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 2.1, Grade-School Math and the Hidden Reasoning Process
- 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoning
- 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models for Math Reasoning Tasks
- 2026Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
- 2024Procedural Knowledge in Pretraining Drives Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025What Makes a Good Curriculum? Disentangling the Effects of Data Ordering on LLM Mathematical Reasoning