Adaptive Problem Generation via Symbolic Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a method for generating training data for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards to improve small open-weights language models on mathematical tasks. Existing data generation approaches rely on open-loop pipelines and fixed modifications that do not adapt to the model's capabilities. Furthermore, they typically operate directly on word problems, limiting control over problem structure. To address this, we perform modifications in a symbolic problem space, representing each problem as a set of symbolic variables and constraints (e.g., via algebraic frameworks such as SymPy or SMT formulations). This representation enables precise control over problem structure, automatic generation of ground-truth solutions, and decouples mathematical reasoning from linguistic realization. We also show that this results in more diverse generations. To adapt the problem difficulty to the model, we introduce a closed-loop framework that learns modification strategies through prompt optimization in symbolic space. Experimental results demonstrate that both adaptive problem generation and symbolic representation modifications contribute to improving the model's math solving ability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2026.
Builds on
32 of 39 references.
References · 32
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
- 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 533
- 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
20 more
- 2023ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 276
- 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 226
- 2024OpenMathInstruct-2: Accelerating AI for Math with Massive Open-Source Instruction Datacited by 194
- 2023MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoningcited by 155
- 2024GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solverscited by 155
- 2024MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 144
- 2024OpenMathInstruct-1: A 1.8 Million Math Instruction Tuning Datasetcited by 143
- 2024RL on Incorrect Synthetic Data Scales the Efficiency of LLM Math Reasoning by Eight-Foldcited by 99
- 2024DART-Math: Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning for Mathematical Problem-Solvingcited by 92
- 2025What Makes a Reward Model a Good Teacher? An Optimization Perspectivecited by 70
- 2024LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancementcited by 69
- 2024Key-Point-Driven Data Synthesis with its Enhancement on Mathematical Reasoningcited by 58
- 2023MuggleMath: Assessing the Impact of Query and Response Augmentation on Math Reasoningcited by 45
- 2025RLVE: Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning for Language Models with Adaptive Verifiable Environmentscited by 43
- 2023Vanishing Gradients in Reinforcement Finetuning of Language Modelscited by 26
- 2024Skywork-Math: Data Scaling Laws for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models -- The Story Goes Oncited by 24
- 2024DataEnvGym: Data Generation Agents in Teacher Environments with Student Feedbackcited by 23
- 2024Neuro-Symbolic Data Generation for Math Reasoningcited by 21
- 2024Montessori-Instruct: Generate Influential Training Data Tailored for Student Learningcited by 12
- 2024From Next-Token to Mathematics: The Learning Dynamics of Mathematical Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Automatic Generation of Socratic Subquestions for Teaching Math Word Problems
- 2025Teaching LLMs to Think Mathematically: A Critical Study of Decision-Making via Optimization
- 2023Reasoning in Large Language Models Through Symbolic Math Word Problems
- 2026Reasoning Core: A Scalable Procedural Data Generation Suite for Symbolic Pre-training and Post-Training
- 2026VERIFY-RL: Verifiable Recursive Decomposition for Reinforcement Learning in Mathematical Reasoning
- 2026Verifier-Backed Hard Problem Generation for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025MathSmith: Towards Extremely Hard Mathematical Reasoning by Forging Synthetic Problems with a Reinforced Policy
- 2022LEMMA: Bootstrapping High-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Learned Symbolic Abstractions