mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Matter of Interest: Understanding Interestingness of Math Problems in Humans and Language Models

arXiv 2511.08548 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The evolution of mathematics is shaped importantly by interestingness: researchers choose which problems to pursue, and students choose which problems to engage with, based on expectations of interest and challenge. As AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs) that operate flexibly over natural language and formal mathematics, are increasingly used in mathematics research and education, it becomes crucial to characterize how closely their judgments align with people from different mathematical backgrounds. We study whether LLMs align with human interestingness judgments by comparing LLM ratings with those of two populations, crowdsourced participants with college math experience and International Math Olympiad competitors. Although many LLMs broadly agree with human notions of interestingness, they largely fail to match the distribution of human judgments. They also weakly align with why humans find problems interesting, with low correlation to human-selected rationales. Finally, we evaluate LLMs' ability to generate interesting problems and find that, after filtering for validity, LLMs are able to generate engaging problems. We conclude with takeaways, including the need for multi-LLM human-AI collaborative systems, that highlight both the promise and current limits of LLMs as partners in mathematical reasoning.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.

Builds on

8 of 33 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  4. 2024Building Machines that Learn and Think with Peoplecited by 73
  5. 2024From Calculation to Adjudication: Examining LLM judges on Mathematical Reasoning Taskscited by 22
  6. 2024Data for Mathematical Copilots: Better Ways of Presenting Proofs for Machine Learningcited by 11
  7. 2024From Next-Token to Mathematics: The Learning Dynamics of Mathematical Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 6
  8. 2025Evaluating Language Models' Evaluations of Gamescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Can Language Models Rival Mathematics Students? Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning through Textual Manipulation and Human Experiments
  2. 2024Assessing the Creativity of LLMs in Proposing Novel Solutions to Mathematical Problems
  3. 2024Do Large Language Models Truly Grasp Mathematics? An Empirical Exploration From Cognitive Psychology
  4. 2024Mathematics and Machine Creativity: A Survey on Bridging Mathematics with AI
  5. 2025CogMath: Assessing LLMs' Authentic Mathematical Ability from a Human Cognitive Perspective
  6. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges
  7. 2026Math Takes Two: A test for emergent mathematical reasoning in communication
  8. 2025Large Language Models in Numberland: A Quick Test of Their Numerical Reasoning Abilities