Combine and Conquer: A Meta-Analysis on Data Shift and Out-of-Distribution Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces a universal approach to seamlessly combine out-of-distribution (OOD) detection scores. These scores encompass a wide range of techniques that leverage the self-confidence of deep learning models and the anomalous behavior of features in the latent space. Not surprisingly, combining such a varied population using simple statistics proves inadequate. To overcome this challenge, we propose a quantile normalization to map these scores into p-values, effectively framing the problem into a multi-variate hypothesis test. Then, we combine these tests using established meta-analysis tools, resulting in a more effective detector with consolidated decision boundaries. Furthermore, we create a probabilistic interpretable criterion by mapping the final statistics into a distribution with known parameters. Through empirical investigation, we explore different types of shifts, each exerting varying degrees of impact on data. Our results demonstrate that our approach significantly improves overall robustness and performance across diverse OOD detection scenarios. Notably, our framework is easily extensible for future developments in detection scores and stands as the first to combine decision boundaries in this context. The code and artifacts associated with this work are publicly availablefootnoteurlhttps://github.com/edadaltocg/detectors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2024.
Builds on
49 of 86 references.
References · 49
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
37 more
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
- 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
- 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 364
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 351
- 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 338
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
- 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
- 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 220
- 2022Extremely Simple Activation Shaping for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 212
- 2021A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detectioncited by 206
- 2023OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 178
- 2021DICE: Leveraging Sparsification for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 166
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2023In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluationcited by 132
- 2022Is Out-of-Distribution Detection Learnable?cited by 109
- 2021MOOD: Multi-level Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 94
- 2021DOCTOR: A Simple Method for Detecting Misclassification Errorscited by 52
- 2022RankFeat: Rank-1 Feature Removal for Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 52
- 2019Out-of-distribution Detection in Classifiers via Generationcited by 49
- 2022Boosting Out-of-distribution Detection with Typical Featurescited by 48
- 2021Neural Mean Discrepancy for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 42
- 2017The iNaturalist Species Classification and Detection Datasetcited by 28
- 2021A statistical framework for efficient out of distribution detection in deep neural networkscited by 27
- 2022Igeood: An Information Geometry Approach to Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 20
- 2017Choosing Between Methods of Combining p-valuescited by 17
- 2023Unsupervised Layer-wise Score Aggregation for Textual OOD Detectioncited by 15
- 2022Context-Aware Drift Detectioncited by 9
- 2023A Functional Data Perspective and Baseline On Multi-Layer Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.