mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Context-Aware Drift Detection

arXiv 2203.08644 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When monitoring machine learning systems, two-sample tests of homogeneity form the foundation upon which existing approaches to drift detection build. They are used to test for evidence that the distribution underlying recent deployment data differs from that underlying the historical reference data. Often, however, various factors such as time-induced correlation mean that batches of recent deployment data are not expected to form an i.i.d. sample from the historical data distribution. Instead we may wish to test for differences in the distributions conditional on textitcontext that is permitted to change. To facilitate this we borrow machinery from the causal inference domain to develop a more general drift detection framework built upon a foundation of two-sample tests for conditional distributional treatment effects. We recommend a particular instantiation of the framework based on maximum conditional mean discrepancies. We then provide an empirical study demonstrating its effectiveness for various drift detection problems of practical interest, such as detecting drift in the distributions underlying subpopulations of data in a manner that is insensitive to their respective prevalences. The study additionally demonstrates applicability to ImageNet-scale vision problems.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2022.

Builds on

16 of 40 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  3. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  4. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470
  5. 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 364
  6. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
  7. 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 165
  8. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  9. 2020Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: a Survey of Case Studiescited by 151
  10. 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 129
  11. 2020A Measure-Theoretic Approach to Kernel Conditional Mean Embeddingscited by 86
  12. 2016Interpretable Distribution Features with Maximum Testing Powercited by 63
4 more
  1. 2015Fast Two-Sample Testing with Analytic Representations of Probability Measurescited by 53
  2. 2021Conditional Distributional Treatment Effect with Kernel Conditional Mean Embeddings and U-Statistic Regressioncited by 40
  3. 2020Monitoring and explainability of models in productioncited by 23
  4. 2021Sequential Multivariate Change Detection with Calibrated and Memoryless False Detection Ratescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

9 papers.