mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve by Learning from Language Feedback

arXiv 2406.07168 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intentions and values is crucial yet challenging. Current methods primarily rely on human preferences, which are costly and insufficient in capturing nuanced feedback expressed in natural language. In this paper, we present Self-Refinement Tuning (SRT), a method that leverages model feedback for alignment, thereby reducing reliance on human annotations. SRT uses a base language model (e.g., Tulu2) to generate initial responses, which are critiqued and refined by a more advanced model (e.g., GPT-4-Turbo). This process enables the base model to self-evaluate and improve its outputs, facilitating continuous learning. SRT further optimizes the model by learning from its self-generated feedback and refinements, creating a feedback loop that promotes model improvement. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that SRT significantly outperforms strong baselines across diverse tasks and model sizes. When applied to a 70B parameter model, SRT increases the win rate from 9.6% to 25.8% on the AlpacaEval 2.0 benchmark, surpassing well-established systems such as GPT-4-0314, Claude 2, and Gemini. Our analysis highlights the crucial role of language feedback in the success of SRT, suggesting potential for further exploration in this direction.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 34 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2024.

Builds on

34 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  2. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey26 Sep

Other references · 32

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  7. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  8. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  9. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  10. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  11. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
  12. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
20 more
  1. 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
  2. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  3. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  4. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  5. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  6. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
  7. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  8. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 486
  9. 2019Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialogcited by 283
  10. 2022Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correctcited by 271
  11. 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategiescited by 236
  12. 2023Training Language Models with Language Feedback at Scalecited by 125
  13. 2023Can Large Language Models Really Improve by Self-critiquing Their Own Plans?cited by 107
  14. 2020Graph-based, Self-Supervised Program Repair from Diagnostic Feedbackcited by 93
  15. 2023Improving Code Generation by Training with Natural Language Feedbackcited by 75
  16. 2023Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment Feedbackcited by 71
  17. 2021Learning Multimodal Rewards from Rankingscited by 41
  18. 2023Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve through Interactive Demonstrationscited by 26
  19. 2023SELF: Self-Evolution with Language Feedbackcited by 24
  20. 2024RankPrompt: Step-by-Step Comparisons Make Language Models Better Reasonerscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language Models
  2. 2026Self-Improvement of Large Language Models: A Technical Overview and Future Outlook
  3. 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
  4. 2025Evolving LLMs' Self-Refinement Capability via Synergistic Training-Inference Optimization
  5. 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge
  6. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions
  7. 2023Data-Efficient Alignment of Large Language Models with Human Feedback Through Natural Language
  8. 2024Improving the Robustness of Large Language Models via Consistency Alignment