mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Reflective Generation at Test Time

arXiv 2510.02919 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly solve complex reasoning tasks via long chain-of-thought, but their forward-only autoregressive generation process is fragile; early token errors can cascade, which creates a clear need for self-reflection mechanisms. However, existing self-reflection either performs revisions over full drafts or learns self-correction via expensive training, both fundamentally reactive and inefficient. To address this, we propose Self-Reflective Generation at Test Time (SRGen), a lightweight test-time framework that reflects before generating at uncertain points. During token generation, SRGen utilizes dynamic entropy thresholding to identify high-uncertainty tokens. For each identified token, it trains a specific corrective vector, which fully exploits the already generated context for a self-reflective generation to correct the token probability distribution. By retrospectively analyzing the partial output, this self-reflection enables more trustworthy decisions, thereby significantly reducing the probability of errors at highly uncertain points. Evaluated on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks and a diverse set of LLMs, SRGen can significantly strengthen model reasoning. Moreover, our findings position SRGen as a plug-and-play method that integrates reflection into the generation process for reliable LLM reasoning, achieving consistent gains with bounded overhead and can be combined with other training-time (e.g., RLHF) and test-time (e.g., SLOT) techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 36 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.

Builds on

36 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Deep Think with Confidence21 Aug
  2. 2025Demystifying Reasoning Dynamics with Mutual Information: Thinking Tokens are Information Peaks in LLM Reasoning3 Jun
  3. 2025When To Solve, When To Verify: Compute-Optimal Problem Solving and Generative Verification for LLM Reasoning1 Apr
  4. 2025Atom of Thoughts for Markov LLM Test-Time Scaling17 Feb
  5. 2025Confidence Improves Self-Consistency in LLMs10 Feb
  6. 2025Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for Effective and Efficient LLM Reasoning1 Feb
  7. 2024Forest-of-Thought: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Enhancing LLM Reasoning12 Dec
  8. 2024Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability29 Nov
  9. 2024Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning19 Sep
  10. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models17 May
  11. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback30 Mar

Other references · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  5. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  6. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  8. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  9. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  10. 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
  11. 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  12. 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 297
13 more
  1. 2024TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Textcited by 273
  2. 2024Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 110
  3. 2025First Return, Entropy-Eliciting Explorecited by 45
  4. 2025Test-Time Preference Optimization: On-the-Fly Alignment via Iterative Textual Feedbackcited by 41
  5. 2025Ignore the KL Penalty! Boosting Exploration on Critical Tokens to Enhance RL Fine-Tuningcited by 34
  6. 2025Reflect, Retry, Reward: Self-Improving LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
  7. 2025Uncertainty-Guided Chain-of-Thought for Code Generation with LLMscited by 32
  8. 2023Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve through Interactive Demonstrationscited by 26
  9. 2025SLOT: Sample-specific Language Model Optimization at Test-timecited by 18
  10. 2025Beyond the Last Answer: Your Reasoning Trace Uncovers More than You Thinkcited by 16
  11. 2024Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve by Learning from Language Feedbackcited by 9
  12. 2023First-Step Advantage: Importance of Starting Right in Multi-Step Math Reasoningcited by 5
  13. 2025Self-Taught Self-Correction for Small Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Think Twice, Generate Once: Safeguarding by Progressive Self-Reflection
  2. 2025ReflCtrl: Controlling LLM Reflection Efficiently via Representation Engineering
  3. 2025Instruct-of-Reflection: Enhancing Large Language Models Iterative Reflection Capabilities via Dynamic-Meta Instruction
  4. 2026SRPO: Self-Reflective Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon Reasoning
  5. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention
  6. 2026TTSR: Test-Time Self-Evolving via Reflection
  7. 2025SSR: Socratic Self-Refine for Large Language Model Reasoning
  8. 2026Learning to Self-Verify Makes Language Models Better Reasoners