Learning from Self Critique and Refinement for Faithful LLM Summarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucinations: output content that is not grounded in the input context, when performing long-form text generation tasks such as summarization. Prior works have shown that hallucinations can be reduced by iteratively critiquing and refining previously generated outputs using either the same model or a more powerful teacher model as the critique. However, these approaches either require additional test-time compute or assume access to more powerful teacher models, making them costly and less practical. In this work, we propose Self Critique and Refinement-based Preference Optimization (SCRPO), which is a self-supervised training framework that first constructs a preference dataset by leveraging the LLM's own critique and refinement capabilities, and then applies preference learning to improve the same LLM for faithful summarization. Experiments on three summarization benchmarks (XSUM CNNDM and SAMSum), demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art self-supervised learning methods in terms of faithfulness metrics while either maintaining or improving other metrics that measure the overall quality of the summary. Moreover, compared to test-time refinement, our approach not only improves efficiency but also results in more faithful summaries.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2025.
Builds on
39 of 44 references.
References · 39
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,102
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
27 more
- 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 535
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 445
- 2022News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3cited by 327
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
- 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 257
- 2024Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizercited by 109
- 2024FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMscited by 83
- 2024Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluationcited by 80
- 2021The Factual Inconsistency Problem in Abstractive Text Summarization: A Surveycited by 79
- 2024Self-Taught Evaluatorscited by 72
- 2024Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Modelscited by 71
- 2022Mutual Information Alleviates Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 68
- 2024Self-Boosting Large Language Models with Synthetic Preference Datacited by 40
- 2024FENICE: Factuality Evaluation of summarization based on Natural language Inference and Claim Extractioncited by 28
- 2022Towards Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 27
- 2024Learning to Refine with Fine-Grained Natural Language Feedbackcited by 27
- 2022Don't Say What You Don't Know: Improving the Consistency of Abstractive Summarization by Constraining Beam Searchcited by 23
- 2024On Positional Bias of Faithfulness for Long-form Summarizationcited by 22
- 2025Towards Effective Extraction and Evaluation of Factual Claimscited by 19
- 2024FIZZ: Factual Inconsistency Detection by Zoom-in Summary and Zoom-out Documentcited by 15
- 2025Rethinking DPO: The Role of Rejected Responses in Preference Misalignmentcited by 15
- 2024Improving Faithfulness of Large Language Models in Summarization via Sliding Generation and Self-Consistencycited by 14
- 2024Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve by Learning from Language Feedbackcited by 9
- 2025MAMM-Refine: A Recipe for Improving Faithfulness in Generation with Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 9
- 2024Model-based Preference Optimization in Abstractive Summarization without Human Feedbackcited by 7
- 2025SCOPE: A Self-supervised Framework for Improving Faithfulness in Conditional Text Generationcited by 5
- 2024Learning to Verify Summary Facts with Fine-Grained LLM Feedbackcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Learning to Summarize from LLM-generated Feedback
- 2023SPEC: Summary Preference Decomposition for Low-Resource Abstractive Summarization
- 2025Refine-n-Judge: Curating High-Quality Preference Chains for LLM-Fine-Tuning
- 2023LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback
- 2025Breaking the Mirror: Activation-Based Mitigation of Self-Preference in LLM Evaluators
- 2023Improving Factual Consistency of News Summarization by Contrastive Preference Optimization
- 2024Pride and Prejudice: LLM Amplifies Self-Bias in Self-Refinement
- 2026Optimising Factual Consistency in Summarisation via Preference Learning from Multiple Imperfect Metrics