mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Task and Motion Planning for Execution in the Real

arXiv 2406.03641 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2024cs.RO cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Task and motion planning represents a powerful set of hybrid planning methods that combine reasoning over discrete task domains and continuous motion generation. Traditional reasoning necessitates task domain models and enough information to ground actions to motion planning queries. Gaps in this knowledge often arise from sources like occlusion or imprecise modeling. This work generates task and motion plans that include actions cannot be fully grounded at planning time. During execution, such an action is handled by a provided human-designed or learned closed-loop behavior. Execution combines offline planned motions and online behaviors till reaching the task goal. Failures of behaviors are fed back as constraints to find new plans. Forty real-robot trials and motivating demonstrations are performed to evaluate the proposed framework and compare against state-of-the-art. Results show faster execution time, less number of actions, and more success in problems where diverse gaps arise. The experiment data is shared for researchers to simulate these settings. The work shows promise in expanding the applicable class of realistic partially grounded problems that robots can address.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2024.

Builds on

28 of 67 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 875
  2. 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 413
  3. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 290
  4. 2018Deep Object Pose Estimation for Semantic Robotic Grasping of Household Objectscited by 241
  5. 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 213
  6. 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 150
  7. 2017Grasp Pose Detection in Point Cloudscited by 111
  8. 2016DESPOT: Online POMDP Planning with Regularizationcited by 106
  9. 20226-DoF Pose Estimation of Household Objects for Robotic Manipulation: An Accessible Dataset and Benchmarkcited by 86
  10. 2017Neural Task Programming: Learning to Generalize Across Hierarchical Taskscited by 76
  11. 2019Online Replanning in Belief Space for Partially Observable Task and Motion Problemscited by 61
  12. 2022Learning Neuro-Symbolic Skills for Bilevel Planningcited by 58
16 more
  1. 2021SORNet: Spatial Object-Centric Representations for Sequential Manipulationcited by 48
  2. 2021Long-Horizon Manipulation of Unknown Objects via Task and Motion Planning with Estimated Affordancescited by 40
  3. 2019Object-Centric Task and Motion Planning in Dynamic Environmentscited by 35
  4. 2020Active Inference and Behavior Trees for Reactive Action Planning and Execution in Roboticscited by 23
  5. 2016Towards Blended Reactive Planning and Acting using Behavior Treescited by 21
  6. 2020Transferable Task Execution from Pixels through Deep Planning Domain Learningcited by 17
  7. 2019Representing Robot Task Plans as Robust Logical-Dynamical Systemscited by 16
  8. 2019Anytime Integrated Task and Motion Policies for Stochastic Environmentscited by 13
  9. 2022Behavior Trees in Robot Control Systemscited by 13
  10. 2021Hierarchical Policies for Cluttered-Scene Grasping with Latent Planscited by 12
  11. 2021Active Learning of Abstract Plan Feasibilitycited by 11
  12. 2021Reactive Task and Motion Planning under Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 9
  13. 2022Sequence-of-Constraints MPC: Reactive Timing-Optimal Control of Sequential Manipulationcited by 6
  14. 2021Robowflex: Robot Motion Planning with MoveIt Made Easycited by 1
  15. 2021Probabilistic Inference in Planning for Partially Observable Long Horizon Problemscited by 1
  16. 2022Task and Motion Informed Trees (TMIT*): Almost-Surely Asymptotically Optimal Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.