Active Learning of Abstract Plan Feasibility
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Long horizon sequential manipulation tasks are effectively addressed hierarchically: at a high level of abstraction the planner searches over abstract action sequences, and when a plan is found, lower level motion plans are generated. Such a strategy hinges on the ability to reliably predict that a feasible low level plan will be found which satisfies the abstract plan. However, computing Abstract Plan Feasibility (APF) is difficult because the outcome of a plan depends on real-world phenomena that are difficult to model, such as noise in estimation and execution. In this work, we present an active learning approach to efficiently acquire an APF predictor through task-independent, curious exploration on a robot. The robot identifies plans whose outcomes would be informative about APF, executes those plans, and learns from their successes or failures. Critically, we leverage an infeasible subsequence property to prune candidate plans in the active learning strategy, allowing our system to learn from less data. We evaluate our strategy in simulation and on a real Franka Emika Panda robot with integrated perception, experimentation, planning, and execution. In a stacking domain where objects have non-uniform mass distributions, we show that our system permits real robot learning of an APF model in four hundred self-supervised interactions, and that our learned model can be used effectively in multiple downstream tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2021.
Builds on
16 of 43 references.
References · 16
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
- 2019Self-Supervised Exploration via Disagreementcited by 263
- 2018Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and controlcited by 242
- 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 147
- 2016A Compositional Object-Based Approach to Learning Physical Dynamicscited by 119
- 2018Model-Based Active Explorationcited by 105
- 2016Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Examplecited by 66
- 2018ShapeStacks: Learning Vision-Based Physical Intuition for Generalised Object Stackingcited by 55
- 2018Relational inductive bias for physical construction in humans and machinescited by 41
4 more
- 2018Active model learning and diverse action sampling for task and motion planningcited by 28
- 2018Learning sparse relational transition modelscited by 11
- 2017The Provable Virtue of Laziness in Motion Planningcited by 6
- 2020Probabilistic Framework for Constrained Manipulations and Task and Motion Planning under Uncertaintycited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Beyond Pick-and-Place: Tackling Robotic Stacking of Diverse Shapescited by 70
- 2024LLM3:Large Language Model-based Task and Motion Planning with Motion Failure Reasoningcited by 63
- 2024Practice Makes Perfect: Planning to Learn Skill Parameter Policiescited by 22
- 2024A Survey of Optimization-based Task and Motion Planning: From Classical To Learning Approachescited by 19
- 2022Learning Efficient Abstract Planning Models that Choose What to Predictcited by 17
- 2023Embodied Active Learning of Relational State Abstractions for Bilevel Planningcited by 8
- 2024Task and Motion Planning for Execution in the Realcited by 6
- 2022Graph-based Reinforcement Learning meets Mixed Integer Programs: An application to 3D robot assembly discoverycited by 5
- 2023ORLA*: Mobile Manipulator-Based Object Rearrangement with Lazy A Starcited by 3
- 2023Tactile Estimation of Extrinsic Contact Patch for Stable Placementcited by 1
- 2026Neurosymbolic Reasoning with Incremental Knowledge for Sample Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Neurosymbolic Reasoning with Incremental Knowledge for Sample Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning4 Aug 2026
- 2024Task and Motion Planning for Execution in the Real5 Jun 2024
- 2024A Survey of Optimization-based Task and Motion Planning: From Classical To Learning Approaches3 Apr 2024
- 2024LLM3:Large Language Model-based Task and Motion Planning with Motion Failure Reasoning18 Mar 2024
- 2024Practice Makes Perfect: Planning to Learn Skill Parameter Policies22 Feb 2024
- 2023Tactile Estimation of Extrinsic Contact Patch for Stable Placement25 Sep 2023
- 2023ORLA*: Mobile Manipulator-Based Object Rearrangement with Lazy A Star24 Sep 2023
- 2023Embodied Active Learning of Relational State Abstractions for Bilevel Planning8 Mar 2023
- 2022Learning Efficient Abstract Planning Models that Choose What to Predict16 Aug 2022
- 2022Graph-based Reinforcement Learning meets Mixed Integer Programs: An application to 3D robot assembly discovery8 Mar 2022
- 2021Beyond Pick-and-Place: Tackling Robotic Stacking of Diverse Shapes12 Oct 2021