Benchmarking for Deep Uplift Modeling in Online Marketing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online marketing is critical for many industrial platforms and business applications, aiming to increase user engagement and platform revenue by identifying corresponding delivery-sensitive groups for specific incentives, such as coupons and bonuses. As the scale and complexity of features in industrial scenarios increase, deep uplift modeling (DUM) as a promising technique has attracted increased research from academia and industry, resulting in various predictive models. However, current DUM still lacks some standardized benchmarks and unified evaluation protocols, which limit the reproducibility of experimental results in existing studies and the practical value and potential impact in this direction. In this paper, we provide an open benchmark for DUM and present comparison results of existing models in a reproducible and uniform manner. To this end, we conduct extensive experiments on two representative industrial datasets with different preprocessing settings to re-evaluate 13 existing models. Surprisingly, our experimental results show that the most recent work differs less than expected from traditional work in many cases. In addition, our experiments also reveal the limitations of DUM in generalization, especially for different preprocessing and test distributions. Our benchmarking work allows researchers to evaluate the performance of new models quickly but also reasonably demonstrates fair comparison results with existing models. It also gives practitioners valuable insights into often overlooked considerations when deploying DUM. We will make this benchmarking library, evaluation protocol, and experimental setup available on GitHub.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2024.
Builds on
14 of 33 references.
References · 14
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
- 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 408
- 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 328
- 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 285
- 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 254
- 2021Nonparametric Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: From Theory to Learning Algorithmscited by 144
- 2020CausalML: Python Package for Causal Machine Learningcited by 74
- 2021On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 74
- 2020Open Benchmarking for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 53
- 2019A Unified Framework for Marketing Budget Allocationcited by 33
- 2023Explicit Feature Interaction-aware Uplift Network for Online Marketingcited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026Evaluating Uplift Modeling under Structural Biases: Insights into Metric Stability and Model Robustnesscited by 1
- 2025TSCAN: Context-Aware Uplift Modeling via Two-Stage Training for Online Merchant Business Diagnosiscited by 0
- 2026Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits: Bridging Uplift Modeling and Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 0
- 2026Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits: Bridging Uplift Modeling and Sequential Decision-Making28 Apr 2026
- 2026Evaluating Uplift Modeling under Structural Biases: Insights into Metric Stability and Model Robustness21 Mar 2026
- 2025TSCAN: Context-Aware Uplift Modeling via Two-Stage Training for Online Merchant Business Diagnosis26 Apr 2025