mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TSCAN: Context-Aware Uplift Modeling via Two-Stage Training for Online Merchant Business Diagnosis

arXiv 2504.18881 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A primary challenge in ITE estimation is sample selection bias. Traditional approaches utilize treatment regularization techniques such as the Integral Probability Metrics (IPM), re-weighting, and propensity score modeling to mitigate this bias. However, these regularizations may introduce undesirable information loss and limit the performance of the model. Furthermore, treatment effects vary across different external contexts, and the existing methods are insufficient in fully interacting with and utilizing these contextual features. To address these issues, we propose a Context-Aware uplift model based on the Two-Stage training approach (TSCAN), comprising CAN-U and CAN-D sub-models. In the first stage, we train an uplift model, called CAN-U, which includes the treatment regularizations of IPM and propensity score prediction, to generate a complete dataset with counterfactual uplift labels. In the second stage, we train a model named CAN-D, which utilizes an isotonic output layer to directly model uplift effects, thereby eliminating the reliance on the regularization components. CAN-D adaptively corrects the errors estimated by CAN-U through reinforcing the factual samples, while avoiding the negative impacts associated with the aforementioned regularizations. Additionally, we introduce a Context-Aware Attention Layer throughout the two-stage process to manage the interactions between treatment, merchant, and contextual features, thereby modeling the varying treatment effect in different contexts. We conduct extensive experiments on two real-world datasets to validate the effectiveness of TSCAN. Ultimately, the deployment of our model for real-world merchant diagnosis on one of China's largest online food ordering platforms validates its practical utility and impact.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2025.

Builds on

27 of 59 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
  2. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
  3. 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 410
  4. 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 329
  5. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 287
  6. 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
  7. 2020Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 78
  8. 2020Counterfactual Representation Learning with Balancing Weightscited by 45
  9. 2018DeepMatch: Balancing Deep Covariate Representations for Causal Inference Using Adversarial Trainingcited by 42
  10. 2018Learning Weighted Representations for Generalization Across Designscited by 41
  11. 2021Estimating Average Treatment Effects via Orthogonal Regularizationcited by 25
  12. 2023Explicit Feature Interaction-aware Uplift Network for Online Marketingcited by 25
15 more
  1. 2020Estimating Individual Treatment Effects with Time-Varying Confounderscited by 21
  2. 2022Deep Learning of Causal Structures in High Dimensionscited by 20
  3. 2022DESCN: Deep Entire Space Cross Networks for Individual Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 16
  4. 2020Learning Decomposed Representation for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 12
  5. 2022A Survey of Deep Causal Models and Their Industrial Applicationscited by 10
  6. 2023Adversarially Balanced Representation for Continuous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 10
  7. 2023Covariate balancing using the integral probability metric for causal inferencecited by 9
  8. 2019Incremental causal effectscited by 7
  9. 2024Entire Chain Uplift Modeling with Context-Enhanced Learning for Intelligent Marketingcited by 7
  10. 2024Multi-Treatment Multi-Task Uplift Modeling for Enhancing User Growthcited by 5
  11. 2018Estimation of Individual Treatment Effect in Latent Confounder Models via Adversarial Learningcited by 4
  12. 2024Benchmarking for Deep Uplift Modeling in Online Marketingcited by 3
  13. 2025Doubly Robust Inference on Causal Derivative Effects for Continuous Treatmentscited by 3
  14. 2025Robust Uplift Modeling with Large-Scale Contexts for Real-time Marketingcited by 3
  15. 2020Feature Interactions in XGBoostcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.