mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine Translation

arXiv 2406.00049 ↗First posted 28 May 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An important challenge in machine translation (MT) is to generate high-quality and diverse translations. Prior work has shown that the estimated likelihood from the MT model correlates poorly with translation quality. In contrast, quality evaluation metrics (such as COMET or BLEURT) exhibit high correlations with human judgments, which has motivated their use as rerankers (such as quality-aware and minimum Bayes risk decoding). However, relying on a single translation with high estimated quality increases the chances of "gaming the metric''. In this paper, we address the problem of sampling a set of high-quality and diverse translations. We provide a simple and effective way to avoid over-reliance on noisy quality estimates by using them as the energy function of a Gibbs distribution. Instead of looking for a mode in the distribution, we generate multiple samples from high-density areas through the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, a simple Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. The results show that our proposed method leads to high-quality and diverse outputs across multiple language pairs (EnglishleftrightarrowGerman, Russian) with two strong decoder-only LLMs (Alma-7b, Tower-7b).

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.

Builds on

48 of 79 references.

References · 48

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  4. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  5. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
  6. 2021Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate Generationcited by 384
  7. 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
  8. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
  9. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 299
  10. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
  11. 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 259
  12. 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
36 more
  1. 2019BERT has a Mouth, and It Must Speak: BERT as a Markov Random Field Language Modelcited by 184
  2. 2022COLD Decoding: Energy-based Constrained Text Generation with Langevin Dynamicscited by 159
  3. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 137
  4. 2022RL with KL penalties is better viewed as Bayesian inferencecited by 130
  5. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  6. 2023Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Translation Modelscited by 126
  7. 2023Aligning Language Models with Preferences through f-divergence Minimizationcited by 118
  8. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
  9. 2019On NMT Search Errors and Model Errors: Cat Got Your Tongue?cited by 114
  10. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  11. 2018CGMH: Constrained Sentence Generation by Metropolis-Hastings Samplingcited by 93
  12. 2023Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 88
  13. 2021Larger-Scale Transformers for Multilingual Masked Language Modelingcited by 86
  14. 2019Beyond BLEU: Training Neural Machine Translation with Semantic Similaritycited by 84
  15. 2022On Reinforcement Learning and Distribution Matching for Fine-Tuning Language Models with no Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 80
  16. 2019Mixture Models for Diverse Machine Translation: Tricks of the Tradecited by 77
  17. 2022Mix and Match: Learning-free Controllable Text Generation using Energy Language Modelscited by 66
  18. 2022Gradient-Based Constrained Sampling from Language Modelscited by 64
  19. 2023Epsilon Sampling Rocks: Investigating Sampling Strategies for Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Machine Translationcited by 57
  20. 2023Bridging the Gap: A Survey on Integrating (Human) Feedback for Natural Language Generationcited by 55
  21. 2018Importance of Search and Evaluation Strategies in Neural Dialogue Modelingcited by 44
  22. 2022Identifying Weaknesses in Machine Translation Metrics Through Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding: A Case Study for COMETcited by 41
  23. 2024Navigating the Metrics Maze: Reconciling Score Magnitudes and Accuraciescited by 40
  24. 2021Exposing the Implicit Energy Networks behind Masked Language Models via Metropolis--Hastingscited by 37
  25. 2024Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Modelcited by 33
  26. 2023BLEURT Has Universal Translations: An Analysis of Automatic Metrics by Minimum Risk Trainingcited by 24
  27. 2016Noisy Parallel Approximate Decoding for Conditional Recurrent Language Modelcited by 18
  28. 2015Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative Models - Reconstructing Gaps in Time Seriescited by 14
  29. 2024Don't Rank, Combine! Combining Machine Translation Hypotheses Using Quality Estimationcited by 13
  30. 2021Smoothing and Shrinking the Sparse Seq2Seq Search Spacecited by 11
  31. 2022Probing BERT's priors with serial reproduction chainscited by 11
  32. 2024Generating Diverse and High-Quality Texts by Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 11
  33. 2018Incorporating Discriminator in Sentence Generation: a Gibbs Sampling Methodcited by 5
  34. 2023A Block Metropolis-Hastings Sampler for Controllable Energy-based Text Generationcited by 5
  35. 2023EEL: Efficiently Encoding Lattices for Rerankingcited by 4
  36. 2023Principled Gradient-based Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Text Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 10.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: