mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BLEURT Has Universal Translations: An Analysis of Automatic Metrics by Minimum Risk Training

arXiv 2307.03131 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2023cs.CLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic metrics play a crucial role in machine translation. Despite the widespread use of n-gram-based metrics, there has been a recent surge in the development of pre-trained model-based metrics that focus on measuring sentence semantics. However, these neural metrics, while achieving higher correlations with human evaluations, are often considered to be black boxes with potential biases that are difficult to detect. In this study, we systematically analyze and compare various mainstream and cutting-edge automatic metrics from the perspective of their guidance for training machine translation systems. Through Minimum Risk Training (MRT), we find that certain metrics exhibit robustness defects, such as the presence of universal adversarial translations in BLEURT and BARTScore. In-depth analysis suggests two main causes of these robustness deficits: distribution biases in the training datasets, and the tendency of the metric paradigm. By incorporating token-level constraints, we enhance the robustness of evaluation metrics, which in turn leads to an improvement in the performance of machine translation systems. Codes are available at urlhttps://github.com/powerpuffpomelo/fairseqmrt.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2023.

Builds on

30 of 36 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  7. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  8. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  9. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  10. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  11. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  12. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
18 more
  1. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 418
  2. 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 163
  3. 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
  4. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 158
  5. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 138
  6. 2020On Exposure Bias, Hallucination and Domain Shift in Neural Machine Translationcited by 127
  7. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 115
  8. 2020Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation in Many Languages via Zero-Shot Paraphrasingcited by 115
  9. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  10. 2019Beyond BLEU: Training Neural Machine Translation with Semantic Similaritycited by 84
  11. 2021Scientific Credibility of Machine Translation Research: A Meta-Evaluation of 769 Paperscited by 71
  12. 2021Understanding the Properties of Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding in Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
  13. 2017Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 55
  14. 2021Perturbation CheckLists for Evaluating NLG Evaluation Metricscited by 50
  15. 2022BERTScore is Unfair: On Social Bias in Language Model-Based Metrics for Text Generationcited by 48
  16. 2022Identifying Weaknesses in Machine Translation Metrics Through Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding: A Case Study for COMETcited by 41
  17. 2022UniTE: Unified Translation Evaluationcited by 28
  18. 2021Language Modeling, Lexical Translation, Reordering: The Training Process of NMT through the Lens of Classical SMTcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 11; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategiescited by 238
  2. 2023Mitigating Hallucinations and Off-target Machine Translation with Source-Contrastive and Language-Contrastive Decodingcited by 42
  3. 2024Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Modelcited by 33
  4. 2024Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translationcited by 16
  5. 2024Can Automatic Metrics Assess High-Quality Translations?cited by 16
  6. 2024QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine Translationcited by 16
  7. 2024Pitfalls and Outlooks in Using COMETcited by 10
  8. 2024Watching the Watchers: Exposing Gender Disparities in Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 10
  9. 2023Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Modelcited by 9
  10. 2024Enabling Weak LLMs to Judge Response Reliability via Meta Rankingcited by 9
  11. 2024SELU: Self-Learning Embodied MLLMs in Unknown Environmentscited by 6
  12. 2025Adding Chocolate to Mint: Mitigating Metric Interference in Machine Translationcited by 6
12 more
  1. 2023Robustness Tests for Automatic Machine Translation Metrics with Adversarial Attackscited by 5
  2. 2024Is Preference Alignment Always the Best Option to Enhance LLM-Based Translation? An Empirical Analysiscited by 4
  3. 2025OpeNLGauge: An Explainable Metric for NLG Evaluation with Open-Weights LLMscited by 4
  4. 2025You Cannot Feed Two Birds with One Score: the Accuracy-Naturalness Tradeoff in Translationcited by 4
  5. 2025Geometric Metrics and LLMs: What They Measure and When They Workcited by 4
  6. 2026Mending the Holes: Mitigating Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Translationcited by 4
  7. 2024Measuring Retrieval Complexity in Question Answering Systemscited by 3
  8. 2025Penalizing Length: Uncovering Systematic Bias in Quality Estimation Metricscited by 2
  9. 2024Unveiling the Power of Source: Source-based Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 0
  10. 2025Document-Level Text Generation with Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Optimal Transportcited by 0
  11. 2026In the Blind: Building Pseudo-References for MT Evaluationcited by 0
  12. 2026Enhancing Small Language Models for Power Outage Report Generation via Minimum Risk Trainingcited by 0