Quality-Aware Decoding: Unifying Quality Estimation and Decoding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quality Estimation (QE) models for Neural Machine Translation (NMT) predict the quality of the hypothesis without having access to the reference. An emerging research direction in NMT involves the use of QE models, which have demonstrated high correlations with human judgment and can enhance translations through Quality-Aware Decoding. Although several approaches have been proposed based on sampling multiple candidate translations and picking the best candidate, none have integrated these models directly into the decoding process. In this paper, we address this by proposing a novel token-level QE model capable of reliably scoring partial translations. We build a uni-directional QE model for this, as decoder models are inherently trained and efficient on partial sequences. We then present a decoding strategy that integrates the QE model for Quality-Aware decoding and demonstrate that the translation quality improves when compared to the N-best list re-ranking with state-of-the-art QE models (up to 1.39 XCOMET-XXL uparrow). Finally, we show that our approach provides significant benefits in document translation tasks, where the quality of N-best lists is typically suboptimal. Code can be found at https://ai4lt.iar.kit.edu/english/projectskontextmt.php
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2025.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
- 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
- 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
- 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 137
- 2020BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocentcited by 109
8 more
- 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
- 2023Reward-Augmented Decoding: Efficient Controlled Text Generation With a Unidirectional Reward Modelcited by 79
- 2024xTower: A Multilingual LLM for Explaining and Correcting Translation Errorscited by 17
- 2024Reinforcement Learning with Token-level Feedback for Controllable Text Generationcited by 16
- 2024QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine Translationcited by 16
- 2024Don't Rank, Combine! Combining Machine Translation Hypotheses Using Quality Estimationcited by 13
- 2024Introducing the NewsPaLM MBR and QE Dataset: LLM-Generated High-Quality Parallel Data Outperforms Traditional Web-Crawled Datacited by 10
- 2023Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Modelcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.