mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine learning in business process management: A systematic literature review

arXiv 2405.16396 ↗First posted 26 May 2024cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) provides algorithms to create computer programs based on data without explicitly programming them. In business process management (BPM), ML applications are used to analyse and improve processes efficiently. Three frequent examples of using ML are providing decision support through predictions, discovering accurate process models, and improving resource allocation. This paper organises the body of knowledge on ML in BPM. We extract BPM tasks from different literature streams, summarise them under the phases of a process`s lifecycle, explain how ML helps perform these tasks and identify technical commonalities in ML implementations across tasks. This study is the first exhaustive review of how ML has been used in BPM. We hope that it can open the door for a new era of cumulative research by helping researchers to identify relevant preliminary work and then combine and further develop existing approaches in a focused fashion. Our paper helps managers and consultants to find ML applications that are relevant in the current project phase of a BPM initiative, like redesigning a business process. We also offer - as a synthesis of our review - a research agenda that spreads ten avenues for future research, including applying novel ML concepts like federated learning, addressing less regarded BPM lifecycle phases like process identification, and delivering ML applications with a focus on end-users.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 282 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2024.

Builds on

55 of 282 references.

References · 55

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  4. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  5. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  6. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
  7. 2019Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applicationscited by 409
  8. 2021A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learningcited by 214
  9. 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 195
  10. 2023Generative AIcited by 119
  11. 2019Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelinescited by 107
  12. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 103
38 more
  1. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 59
  2. 2020Deep Learning for Predictive Business Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 45
  3. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
  4. 2017Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligencecited by 40
  5. 2013Predictive Monitoring of Business Processescited by 37
  6. 2017Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 37
  7. 2021A systematic literature review on state-of-the-art deep learning methods for process predictioncited by 32
  8. 2020Predictive Business Process Monitoring via Generative Adversarial Nets: The Case of Next Event Predictioncited by 31
  9. 2018Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best?cited by 27
  10. 2020Explainable Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 27
  11. 2021Machine learning and deep learningcited by 26
  12. 2019Learning with Known Operators reduces Maximum Training Error Boundscited by 25
  13. 2015Clustering-Based Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 24
  14. 2016Time and Activity Sequence Prediction of Business Process Instancescited by 24
  15. 2020Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actionscited by 22
  16. 2021A Deep Adversarial Model for Suffix and Remaining Time Prediction of Event Sequencescited by 17
  17. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring for Cost-Aware Cycle Time Reductioncited by 17
  18. 2018Alarm-Based Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 16
  19. 2019An Approach for Process Model Extraction By Multi-Grained Text Classificationcited by 16
  20. 2021Creating Unbiased Public Benchmark Datasets with Data Leakage Prevention for Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 16
  21. 2020Process Mining Meets Causal Machine Learning: Discovering Causal Rules from Event Logscited by 15
  22. 2019BINet: Multi-perspective Business Process Anomaly Classificationcited by 13
  23. 2021DiCE4EL: Interpreting Process Predictions using a Milestone-Aware Counterfactual Approachcited by 13
  24. 2021Learning Accurate Business Process Simulation Models from Event Logs via Automated Process Discovery and Deep Learningcited by 10
  25. 2016Event Abstraction for Process Mining using Supervised Learning Techniquescited by 9
  26. 2019Fairness-Aware Process Miningcited by 9
  27. 2021Text-Aware Predictive Monitoring of Business Processescited by 9
  28. 2019Comprehensive Process Drift Detection with Visual Analyticscited by 8
  29. 2018Analyzing Business Process Anomalies Using Autoencoderscited by 7
  30. 2020Handling Concept Drift for Predictions in Business Process Miningcited by 7
  31. 2021Process Discovery Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 7
  32. 2020Adversarial System Variant Approximation to Quantify Process Model Generalizationcited by 6
  33. 2021Multivariate Business Process Representation Learning utilizing Gramian Angular Fields and Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6
  34. 2021Building Interpretable Models for Business Process Prediction using Shared and Specialised Attention Mechanismscited by 6
  35. 2020Cause vs. Effect in Context-Sensitive Prediction of Business Process Instancescited by 5
  36. 2020Shedding Light on Blind Spots: Developing a Reference Architecture to Leverage Video Data for Process Miningcited by 5
  37. 2021Learning Uncertainty with Artificial Neural Networks for Improved Remaining Time Prediction of Business Processescited by 4
  38. 2021Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Process Mining: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 4

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5.

5 papers.