mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Building Interpretable Models for Business Process Prediction using Shared and Specialised Attention Mechanisms

arXiv 2109.01419 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we address the "black-box" problem in predictive process analytics by building interpretable models that are capable to inform both what and why is a prediction. Predictive process analytics is a newly emerged discipline dedicated to providing business process intelligence in modern organisations. It uses event logs, which capture process execution traces in the form of multi-dimensional sequence data, as the key input to train predictive models. These predictive models, often built upon deep learning techniques, can be used to make predictions about the future states of business process execution. We apply attention mechanism to achieve model interpretability. We propose i) two types of attentions: event attention to capture the impact of specific process events on a prediction, and attribute attention to reveal which attribute(s) of an event influenced the prediction; and ii) two attention mechanisms: shared attention mechanism and specialised attention mechanism to reflect different design decisions in when to construct attribute attention on individual input features (specialised) or using the concatenated feature tensor of all input feature vectors (shared). These lead to two distinct attention-based models, and both are interpretable models that incorporate interpretability directly into the structure of a process predictive model. We conduct experimental evaluation of the proposed models using real-life dataset, and comparative analysis between the models for accuracy and interpretability, and draw insights from the evaluation and analysis results.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2021.

Builds on

17 of 46 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 971
  4. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 388
  5. 2016RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanismcited by 345
  6. 2017Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Modelscited by 205
  7. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 103
  8. 2018RetainVis: Visual Analytics with Interpretable and Interactive Recurrent Neural Networks on Electronic Medical Recordscited by 61
  9. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 59
  10. 2020Deep Learning for Predictive Business Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 45
  11. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
  12. 2017Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 37
5 more
  1. 2021ProcessTransformer: Predictive Business Process Monitoring with Transformer Networkcited by 36
  2. 2020Explainable Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 27
  3. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Process Mining: A General Overview and Application of a Novel Local Explanation Approach for Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 20
  4. 2020XNAP: Making LSTM-based Next Activity Predictions Explainable by Using LRPcited by 12
  5. 2019Exploiting Event Log Event Attributes in RNN Based Predictioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.