Task agnostic continual learning with Pairwise layer architecture
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most of the dominant approaches to continual learning are based on either memory replay, parameter isolation, or regularization techniques that require task boundaries to calculate task statistics. We propose a static architecture-based method that doesn't use any of these. We show that we can improve the continual learning performance by replacing the final layer of our networks with our pairwise interaction layer. The pairwise interaction layer uses sparse representations from a Winner-take-all style activation function to find the relevant correlations in the hidden layer representations. The networks using this architecture show competitive performance in MNIST and FashionMNIST-based continual image classification experiments. We demonstrate this in an online streaming continual learning setup where the learning system cannot access task labels or boundaries.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.
Builds on
31 of 45 references.
References · 31
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
- 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
- 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
- 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 672
- 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 568
- 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 516
19 more
- 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 361
- 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 338
- 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
- 2018Task-Free Continual Learningcited by 219
- 2020Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual Learningcited by 177
- 2018A Study on Overfitting in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 170
- 2019Uncertainty-based Continual Learning with Adaptive Regularizationcited by 144
- 2019Uncertainty-guided Continual Learning with Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 100
- 2021Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learningcited by 76
- 2018Task Agnostic Continual Learning Using Online Variational Bayescited by 61
- 2018Selfless Sequential Learningcited by 44
- 2019AutoCross: Automatic Feature Crossing for Tabular Data in Real-World Applicationscited by 39
- 2021Avoiding Catastrophe: Active Dendrites Enable Multi-Task Learning in Dynamic Environmentscited by 24
- 2022Task-Free Continual Learning via Online Discrepancy Distance Learningcited by 22
- 2021Continual Learning in Deep Networks: an Analysis of the Last Layercited by 17
- 2023Prediction Error-based Classification for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 14
- 2021Algorithmic insights on continual learning from fruit fliescited by 11
- 2023Elephant Neural Networks: Born to Be a Continual Learnercited by 10
- 2024Hard ASH: Sparsity and the right optimizer make a continual learnercited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.