mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Incomplete Multimodal Industrial Anomaly Detection via Cross-Modal Distillation

arXiv 2405.13571 ↗First posted 22 May 2024cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies of multimodal industrial anomaly detection (IAD) based on 3D point clouds and RGB images have highlighted the importance of exploiting the redundancy and complementarity among modalities for accurate classification and segmentation. However, achieving multimodal IAD in practical production lines remains a work in progress. It is essential to consider the trade-offs between the costs and benefits associated with the introduction of new modalities while ensuring compatibility with current processes. Existing quality control processes combine rapid in-line inspections, such as optical and infrared imaging with high-resolution but time-consuming near-line characterization techniques, including industrial CT and electron microscopy to manually or semi-automatically locate and analyze defects in the production of Li-ion batteries and composite materials. Given the cost and time limitations, only a subset of the samples can be inspected by all in-line and near-line methods, and the remaining samples are only evaluated through one or two forms of in-line inspection. To fully exploit data for deep learning-driven automatic defect detection, the models must have the ability to leverage multimodal training and handle incomplete modalities during inference. In this paper, we propose CMDIAD, a Cross-Modal Distillation framework for IAD to demonstrate the feasibility of a Multi-modal Training, Few-modal Inference (MTFI) pipeline. Our findings show that the MTFI pipeline can more effectively utilize incomplete multimodal information compared to applying only a single modality for training and inference. Moreover, we investigate the reasons behind the asymmetric performance improvement using point clouds or RGB images as the main modality of inference. This provides a foundation for our future multimodal dataset construction with additional modalities from manufacturing scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.

Builds on

37 of 69 references.

References · 37

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  2. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  3. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  4. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
  5. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,420
  6. 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
  7. 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 594
  8. 2022Masked Autoencoders for Point Cloud Self-supervised Learningcited by 459
  9. 2022SPot-the-Difference Self-Supervised Pre-training for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 400
  10. 2020Multiresolution Knowledge Distillation for Anomaly Detectioncited by 285
  11. 2018Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoderscited by 264
  12. 2021The MVTec 3D-AD Dataset for Unsupervised 3D Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 178
25 more
  1. 2023Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 148
  2. 2021Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching for Anomaly Detectioncited by 146
  3. 2023Multimodal Industrial Anomaly Detection via Hybrid Fusioncited by 139
  4. 2018Evaluation of CNN-based Single-Image Depth Estimation Methodscited by 138
  5. 2022CFA: Coupled-hypersphere-based Feature Adaptation for Target-Oriented Anomaly Localizationcited by 135
  6. 2022Asymmetric Student-Teacher Networks for Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 117
  7. 2022Back to the Feature: Classical 3D Features are (Almost) All You Need for 3D Anomaly Detectioncited by 93
  8. 2018Modality Distillation with Multiple Stream Networks for Action Recognitioncited by 83
  9. 2022Deep Learning for Unsupervised Anomaly Localization in Industrial Images: A Surveycited by 68
  10. 2018An Augmented Linear Mixing Model to Address Spectral Variability for Hyperspectral Unmixingcited by 66
  11. 2022Anomaly Detection in 3D Point Clouds using Deep Geometric Descriptorscited by 66
  12. 2022The Eyecandies Dataset for Unsupervised Multimodal Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 57
  13. 2018Im2Struct: Recovering 3D Shape Structure from a Single RGB Imagecited by 55
  14. 2023Learnable Cross-modal Knowledge Distillation for Multi-modal Learning with Missing Modalitycited by 45
  15. 2023Multimodal Industrial Anomaly Detection by Crossmodal Feature Mappingcited by 42
  16. 2023Cheating Depth: Enhancing 3D Surface Anomaly Detection via Depth Simulationcited by 33
  17. 2024MedIAnomaly: A comparative study of anomaly detection in medical imagescited by 26
  18. 2022CSFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Cross Strip Correlation for Autonomous Drivingcited by 16
  19. 2023Inconsistent Matters: A Knowledge-guided Dual-consistency Network for Multi-modal Rumor Detectioncited by 13
  20. 2021Contrastive Predictive Coding for Anomaly Detectioncited by 10
  21. 2022UNIF: United Neural Implicit Functions for Clothed Human Reconstruction and Animationcited by 8
  22. 2022Composite Score for Anomaly Detection in Imbalanced Real-World Industrial Datasetcited by 7
  23. 2022Unsupervised Visual Defect Detection with Score-Based Generative Modelcited by 7
  24. 2021A Multi-Scale A Contrario method for Unsupervised Image Anomaly Detectioncited by 5
  25. 2022AltUB: Alternating Training Method to Update Base Distribution of Normalizing Flow for Anomaly Detectioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.