System Safety Monitoring of Learned Components Using Temporal Metric Forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In learning-enabled autonomous systems, safety monitoring of learned components is crucial to ensure their outputs do not lead to system safety violations, given the operational context of the system. However, developing a safety monitor for practical deployment in real-world applications is challenging. This is due to limited access to internal workings and training data of the learned component. Furthermore, safety monitors should predict safety violations with low latency, while consuming a reasonable amount of computation. To address the challenges, we propose a safety monitoring method based on probabilistic time series forecasting. Given the learned component outputs and an operational context, we empirically investigate different Deep Learning (DL)-based probabilistic forecasting to predict the objective measure capturing the satisfaction or violation of a safety requirement (safety metric). We empirically evaluate safety metric and violation prediction accuracy, and inference latency and resource usage of four state-of-the-art models, with varying horizons, using autonomous aviation and autonomous driving case studies. Our results suggest that probabilistic forecasting of safety metrics, given learned component outputs and scenarios, is effective for safety monitoring. Furthermore, for both case studies, Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) was the most accurate model for predicting imminent safety violations, with acceptable latency and resource consumption.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2024.
Builds on
35 of 104 references.
References · 35
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,004
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 748
- 2020Time Series Forecasting With Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 457
23 more
- 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 213
- 2017A Multi-Horizon Quantile Recurrent Forecastercited by 211
- 2020Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Tutorial and Literature Surveycited by 117
- 2022Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 87
- 2018Deep Neural Network Compression for Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systemscited by 58
- 2019Misbehaviour Prediction for Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 55
- 2022Criteria for Classifying Forecasting Methodscited by 48
- 2023Fully neuromorphic vision and control for autonomous drone flightcited by 30
- 2020Deep Learning-Based Anomaly Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems: Progress and Opportunitiescited by 27
- 2021Verification of Image-based Neural Network Controllers Using Generative Modelscited by 27
- 2021Run-Time Monitoring of Machine Learning for Robotic Perception: A Survey of Emerging Trendscited by 26
- 2021Taxonomy of Machine Learning Safety: A Survey and Primercited by 22
- 2020Resource-Efficient Neural Networks for Embedded Systemscited by 20
- 2019Towards Structured Evaluation of Deep Neural Network Supervisorscited by 19
- 2021Self-Checking Deep Neural Networks in Deploymentcited by 18
- 2023Closed-loop Analysis of Vision-based Autonomous Systems: A Case Studycited by 18
- 2021DeepGuard: A Framework for Safeguarding Autonomous Driving Systems from Inconsistent Behaviorcited by 17
- 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake Systemcited by 14
- 2024Predicting Safety Misbehaviours in Autonomous Driving Systems using Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 11
- 2023SMARLA: A Safety Monitoring Approach for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 9
- 2020Quantifying Assurance in Learning-enabled Systemscited by 4
- 2023Identifying the Hazard Boundary of ML-enabled Autonomous Systems Using Cooperative Co-Evolutionary Searchcited by 2
- 2023Towards Quantification of Assurance for Learning-enabled Componentscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026Embodied Foundation Models at the Edge: A Survey of Deployment Constraints and Mitigation Strategiescited by 6
- 2025Digital Twin-based Out-of-Distribution Detection in Autonomous Vesselscited by 3
- 2025Label Forensics: Interpreting Hard Labels in Black-Box Text Classifiercited by 0
- 2026Uncertainty-Guided Label Rebalancing for CPS Safety Monitoringcited by 0
- 2026Uncertainty-Guided Label Rebalancing for CPS Safety Monitoring26 Mar 2026
- 2026Embodied Foundation Models at the Edge: A Survey of Deployment Constraints and Mitigation Strategies16 Mar 2026
- 2025Label Forensics: Interpreting Hard Labels in Black-Box Text Classifier1 Dec 2025
- 2025Digital Twin-based Out-of-Distribution Detection in Autonomous Vessels28 Apr 2025