mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Predicting Safety Misbehaviours in Autonomous Driving Systems using Uncertainty Quantification

arXiv 2404.18573 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.RO cs.SEcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The automated real-time recognition of unexpected situations plays a crucial role in the safety of autonomous vehicles, especially in unsupported and unpredictable scenarios. This paper evaluates different Bayesian uncertainty quantification methods from the deep learning domain for the anticipatory testing of safety-critical misbehaviours during system-level simulation-based testing. Specifically, we compute uncertainty scores as the vehicle executes, following the intuition that high uncertainty scores are indicative of unsupported runtime conditions that can be used to distinguish safe from failure-inducing driving behaviors. In our study, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness and computational overhead associated with two Bayesian uncertainty quantification methods, namely MC- Dropout and Deep Ensembles, for misbehaviour avoidance. Overall, for three benchmarks from the Udacity simulator comprising both out-of-distribution and unsafe conditions introduced via mutation testing, both methods successfully detected a high number of out-of-bounds episodes providing early warnings several seconds in advance, outperforming two state-of-the-art misbehaviour prediction methods based on autoencoders and attention maps in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Notably, Deep Ensembles detected most misbehaviours without any false alarms and did so even when employing a relatively small number of models, making them computationally feasible for real-time detection. Our findings suggest that incorporating uncertainty quantification methods is a viable approach for building fail-safe mechanisms in deep neural network-based autonomous vehicles.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2024.

Builds on

32 of 73 references.

References · 32

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  5. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  6. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,009
  7. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  8. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
  9. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
  10. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Autonomous Drivingcited by 403
  11. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 379
  12. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
20 more
  1. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 251
  2. 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 124
  3. 2020LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 121
  4. 2019Taxonomy of Real Faults in Deep Learning Systemscited by 90
  5. 2022Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 87
  6. 2019Uncertainty Quantification with Statistical Guarantees in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 61
  7. 2018Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 55
  8. 2019Misbehaviour Prediction for Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 55
  9. 2020Model-based Exploration of the Frontier of Behaviours for Deep Learning System Testingcited by 40
  10. 2021Mind the Gap! A Study on the Transferability of Virtual vs Physical-world Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 37
  11. 2019Comparing Offline and Online Testing of Deep Neural Networks: An Autonomous Car Case Studycited by 27
  12. 2019Towards Structured Evaluation of Deep Neural Network Supervisorscited by 19
  13. 2021Self-Checking Deep Neural Networks in Deploymentcited by 18
  14. 2021DeepGuard: A Framework for Safeguarding Autonomous Driving Systems from Inconsistent Behaviorcited by 17
  15. 2017Deep Predictive Models for Collision Risk Assessment in Autonomous Drivingcited by 15
  16. 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake Systemcited by 14
  17. 2021Fail-Safe Execution of Deep Learning based Systems through Uncertainty Monitoringcited by 11
  18. 2020Uncertainty-Wizard: Fast and User-Friendly Neural Network Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 9
  19. 2023Two is Better Than One: Digital Siblings to Improve Autonomous Driving Testingcited by 9
  20. 2023Pretrain, Prompt, and Transfer: Evolving Digital Twins for Time-to-Event Analysis in Cyber-physical Systemscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

11 papers.