mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Layout Agnostic Human Activity Recognition in Smart Homes through Textual Descriptions Of Sensor Triggers (TDOST)

arXiv 2405.12368 ↗First posted 20 May 2024cs.AI cs.CL cs.HCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human activity recognition (HAR) using ambient sensors in smart homes has numerous applications for human healthcare and wellness. However, building general-purpose HAR models that can be deployed to new smart home environments requires a significant amount of annotated sensor data and training overhead. Most smart homes vary significantly in their layouts, i.e., floor plans and the specifics of sensors embedded, resulting in low generalizability of HAR models trained for specific homes. We address this limitation by introducing a novel, layout-agnostic modeling approach for HAR systems in smart homes that utilizes the transferrable representational capacity of natural language descriptions of raw sensor data. To this end, we generate Textual Descriptions Of Sensor Triggers (TDOST) that encapsulate the surrounding trigger conditions and provide cues for underlying activities to the activity recognition models. Leveraging textual embeddings, rather than raw sensor data, we create activity recognition systems that predict standard activities across homes without either (re-)training or adaptation on target homes. Through an extensive evaluation, we demonstrate the effectiveness of TDOST-based models in unseen smart homes through experiments on benchmarked CASAS datasets. Furthermore, we conduct a detailed analysis of how the individual components of our approach affect downstream activity recognition performance.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 140 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2024.

Builds on

42 of 140 references.

References · 42

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  6. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  7. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  8. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  9. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  10. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  11. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  12. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
30 more
  1. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
  2. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
  3. 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
  4. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  5. 2019S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 335
  6. 2018Meta-Transfer Learning for Few-Shot Learningcited by 306
  7. 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 287
  8. 2017Domain Adaptation for Visual Applications: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 127
  9. 2019Relation-Aware Graph Attention Network for Visual Question Answeringcited by 119
  10. 2024Large Language Models for Time Series: A Surveycited by 113
  11. 2020What makes instance discrimination good for transfer learning?cited by 111
  12. 2019Evaluating Commonsense in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 95
  13. 2020Self-training for Few-shot Transfer Across Extreme Task Differencescited by 75
  14. 2022Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 63
  15. 2020Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognitioncited by 54
  16. 2024HARGPT: Are LLMs Zero-Shot Human Activity Recognizers?cited by 52
  17. 2023TENT: Connect Language Models with IoT Sensors for Zero-Shot Activity Recognitioncited by 25
  18. 2021A Survey of Human Activity Recognition in Smart Homes Based on IoT Sensors Algorithms: Taxonomies, Challenges, and Opportunities with Deep Learningcited by 21
  19. 2020Fully Convolutional Network Bootstrapped by Word Encoding and Embedding for Activity Recognition in Smart Homescited by 14
  20. 2021Explainable Activity Recognition for Smart Home Systemscited by 14
  21. 2024Transfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition: A Surveycited by 14
  22. 2021Using Language Model to Bootstrap Human Activity Recognition Ambient Sensors Based in Smart Homescited by 12
  23. 2023Unsupervised Human Activity Recognition through Two-stage Prompting with ChatGPTcited by 11
  24. 2018Instance-based Deep Transfer Learningcited by 10
  25. 2019Activity2Vec: Learning ADL Embeddings from Sensor Data with a Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 8
  26. 2022Lifelong Adaptive Machine Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Prototypical Networkscited by 7
  27. 2023Towards Learning Discrete Representations via Self-Supervision for Wearables-Based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 7
  28. 2015Augmenting Bag-of-Words: Data-Driven Discovery of Temporal and Structural Information for Activity Recognitioncited by 6
  29. 2024Is Synthetic Image Useful for Transfer Learning? An Investigation into Data Generation, Volume, and Utilizationcited by 6
  30. 2021Human Activity Recognition (HAR) in Smart Homescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: