mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When AI Eats Itself: On the Caveats of AI Autophagy

arXiv 2405.09597 ↗First posted 15 May 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies and large models are producing realistic outputs across various domains, such as images, text, speech, and music. Creating these advanced generative models requires significant resources, particularly large and high-quality datasets. To minimise training expenses, many algorithm developers use data created by the models themselves as a cost-effective training solution. However, not all synthetic data effectively improve model performance, necessitating a strategic balance in the use of real versus synthetic data to optimise outcomes. Currently, the previously well-controlled integration of real and synthetic data is becoming uncontrollable. The widespread and unregulated dissemination of synthetic data online leads to the contamination of datasets traditionally compiled through web scraping, now mixed with unlabeled synthetic data. This trend, known as the AI autophagy phenomenon, suggests a future where generative AI systems may increasingly consume their own outputs without discernment, raising concerns about model performance, reliability, and ethical implications. What will happen if generative AI continuously consumes itself without discernment? What measures can we take to mitigate the potential adverse effects? To address these research questions, this study examines the existing literature, delving into the consequences of AI autophagy, analyzing the associated risks, and exploring strategies to mitigate its impact. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive perspective on this phenomenon advocating for a balanced approach that promotes the sustainable development of generative AI technologies in the era of large models.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2024.

Builds on

35 of 85 references.

References · 35

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  4. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  5. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  6. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  7. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
  8. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  9. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  10. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 656
  11. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  12. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
23 more
  1. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  2. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  3. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 265
  4. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 239
  5. 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 187
  6. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
  7. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 175
  8. 2019Robust Invisible Video Watermarking with Attentioncited by 144
  9. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  10. 2019Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matricescited by 124
  11. 2023PatchCraft: Exploring Texture Patch for Efficient AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 119
  12. 2022Towards the Detection of Diffusion Model Deepfakescited by 111
  13. 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 111
  14. 2018Detecting GAN-generated Imagery using Color Cuescited by 75
  15. 2023Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Modelscited by 68
  16. 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 59
  17. 2023Towards Understanding the Interplay of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Internetcited by 54
  18. 2023Towards Codable Watermarking for Injecting Multi-bits Information to LLMscited by 43
  19. 2023Combining Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet: Heading towards Evolution or Degradation?cited by 41
  20. 2023DPIC: Decoupling Prompt and Intrinsic Characteristics for LLM Generated Text Detectioncited by 18
  21. 2023Efficient Detection of LLM-generated Texts with a Bayesian Surrogate Modelcited by 18
  22. 2023Utilizing Synthetic Data for Medical Vision-Language Pre-training: Bypassing the Need for Real Imagescited by 16
  23. 2023On the Limitation of Diffusion Models for Synthesizing Training Datasetscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.