mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stronger and Faster Wasserstein Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2008.02883 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep models, while being extremely flexible and accurate, are surprisingly vulnerable to "small, imperceptible" perturbations known as adversarial attacks. While the majority of existing attacks focus on measuring perturbations under the ℓp metric, Wasserstein distance, which takes geometry in pixel space into account, has long been known to be a suitable metric for measuring image quality and has recently risen as a compelling alternative to the ℓp metric in adversarial attacks. However, constructing an effective attack under the Wasserstein metric is computationally much more challenging and calls for better optimization algorithms. We address this gap in two ways: (a) we develop an exact yet efficient projection operator to enable a stronger projected gradient attack; (b) we show that the Frank-Wolfe method equipped with a suitable linear minimization oracle works extremely fast under Wasserstein constraints. Our algorithms not only converge faster but also generate much stronger attacks. For instance, we decrease the accuracy of a residual network on CIFAR-10 to 3.4% within a Wasserstein perturbation ball of radius 0.005, in contrast to 65.6% using the previous Wasserstein attack based on an approximate projection operator. Furthermore, employing our stronger attacks in adversarial training significantly improves the robustness of adversarially trained models.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 6; 2023: 0; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
  2. 2022Robust Unlearnable Examples: Protecting Data Against Adversarial Learningcited by 34
  3. 2021Towards Defending against Adversarial Examples via Attack-Invariant Featurescited by 25
  4. 2024Adversarial Attacks of Vision Tasks in the Past 10 Years: A Surveycited by 22
  5. 2021Removing Adversarial Noise in Class Activation Feature Spacecited by 18
  6. 2021Training Meta-Surrogate Model for Transferable Adversarial Attackcited by 15
  7. 2022Existence and Minimax Theorems for Adversarial Surrogate Risks in Binary Classificationcited by 15
  8. 2022Improving Adversarial Robustness via Mutual Information Estimationcited by 13
  9. 2021SLOSH: Set LOcality Sensitive Hashing via Sliced-Wasserstein Embeddingscited by 9
  10. 2021Modeling Adversarial Noise for Adversarial Trainingcited by 8
  11. 2022Formulating Robustness Against Unforeseen Attackscited by 8
  12. 2024Robust Overfitting Does Matter: Test-Time Adversarial Purification With FGSMcited by 6
13 more
  1. 2021Improving White-box Robustness of Pre-processing Defenses via Joint Adversarial Trainingcited by 3
  2. 2025Unsupervised Robust Domain Adaptation: Paradigm, Theory and Algorithmcited by 3
  3. 2021Adversarial Attack across Datasetscited by 2
  4. 2022Multiple Perturbation Attack: Attack Pixelwise Under Different ℓp-norms For Better Adversarial Performancecited by 2
  5. 2024Effective and Robust Adversarial Training against Data and Label Corruptionscited by 2
  6. 2025Adapting to Evolving Adversaries with Regularized Continual Robust Trainingcited by 2
  7. 2025Rethinking the Vulnerability of Concept Erasure and a New Methodcited by 2
  8. 2021Internal Wasserstein Distance for Adversarial Attack and Defensecited by 1
  9. 2024Position: Towards Resilience Against Adversarial Examplescited by 1
  10. 2024DMS: Addressing Information Loss with More Steps for Pragmatic Adversarial Attackscited by 1
  11. 2021Structural Causal Models Reveal Confounder Bias in Linear Program Modellingcited by 0
  12. 2022Finding Structure and Causality in Linear Programscited by 0
  13. 2026Feature-Space Smoothing: Certified Robustness of Deep Representationscited by 0