Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper describes a differentially private post-processing algorithm for learning fair regressors satisfying statistical parity, addressing privacy concerns of machine learning models trained on sensitive data, as well as fairness concerns of their potential to propagate historical biases. Our algorithm can be applied to post-process any given regressor to improve fairness by remapping its outputs. It consists of three steps: first, the output distributions are estimated privately via histogram density estimation and the Laplace mechanism, then their Wasserstein barycenter is computed, and the optimal transports to the barycenter are used for post-processing to satisfy fairness. We analyze the sample complexity of our algorithm and provide fairness guarantee, revealing a trade-off between the statistical bias and variance induced from the choice of the number of bins in the histogram, in which using less bins always favors fairness at the expense of error.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2024.
Builds on
31 of 63 references.
References · 31
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2013Fast Computation of Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 216
- 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
19 more
- 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
- 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
- 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 99
- 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
- 2018Private Selection from Private Candidatescited by 75
- 2020Faster Wasserstein Distance Estimation with the Sinkhorn Divergencecited by 73
- 2018Revisiting differentially private linear regression: optimal and adaptive prediction & estimation in unbounded domaincited by 60
- 2019Private Hypothesis Selectioncited by 60
- 2020Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approachcited by 53
- 2022Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-Processingcited by 50
- 2020Fair Learning with Private Demographic Datacited by 46
- 2020On the Sample Complexity of Privately Learning Unbounded High-Dimensional Gaussianscited by 41
- 2020Differentially Private Simple Linear Regressioncited by 33
- 2021The Role of Adaptive Optimizers for Honest Private Hyperparameter Selectioncited by 25
- 2020Wasserstein barycenters can be computed in polynomial time in fixed dimensioncited by 23
- 2015Discrete Wasserstein Barycenters: Optimal Transport for Discrete Datacited by 20
- 2016Decision Tree Classification with Differential Privacy: A Surveycited by 17
- 2021Understanding and Mitigating Accuracy Disparity in Regressioncited by 17
- 2021Unbiased Statistical Estimation and Valid Confidence Intervals Under Differential Privacycited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.
5 papers.
- 2024Differentially Private Random Feature Modelcited by 2
- 2025The Pitfalls of "Security by Obscurity" And What They Mean for Transparent AIcited by 2
- 2025Learning with Differentially Private (Sliced) Wasserstein Gradientscited by 2
- 2025Wasserstein projection distance for fairness testing of regression modelscited by 0
- 2025Toward Unifying Group Fairness Evaluation from a Sparsity Perspectivecited by 0
- 2025Toward Unifying Group Fairness Evaluation from a Sparsity Perspective1 Nov 2025
- 2025Wasserstein projection distance for fairness testing of regression models5 Oct 2025
- 2025Learning with Differentially Private (Sliced) Wasserstein Gradients3 Feb 2025
- 2025The Pitfalls of "Security by Obscurity" And What They Mean for Transparent AI30 Jan 2025
- 2024Differentially Private Random Feature Model6 Dec 2024