mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Differentially Private Random Feature Model

arXiv 2412.04785 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing privacy-preserving machine learning algorithms has received great attention in recent years, especially in the setting when the data contains sensitive information. Differential privacy (DP) is a widely used mechanism for data analysis with privacy guarantees. In this paper, we produce a differentially private random feature model. Random features, which were proposed to approximate large-scale kernel machines, have been used to study privacy-preserving kernel machines as well. We consider the over-parametrized regime (more features than samples) where the non-private random feature model is learned via solving the min-norm interpolation problem, and then we apply output perturbation techniques to produce a private model. We show that our method preserves privacy and derive a generalization error bound for the method. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to consider privacy-preserving random feature models in the over-parametrized regime and provide theoretical guarantees. We empirically compare our method with other privacy-preserving learning methods in the literature as well. Our results show that our approach is superior to the other methods in terms of generalization performance on synthetic data and benchmark data sets. Additionally, it was recently observed that DP mechanisms may exhibit and exacerbate disparate impact, which means that the outcomes of DP learning algorithms vary significantly among different groups. We show that both theoretically and empirically, random features have the potential to reduce disparate impact, and hence achieve better fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2024.

Builds on

22 of 47 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  4. 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 127
  5. 2020Random Features for Kernel Approximation: A Survey on Algorithms, Theory, and Beyondcited by 107
  6. 2019Limitations of Lazy Training of Two-layers Neural Networkscited by 87
  7. 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
  8. 2017Efficient Private ERM for Smooth Objectivescited by 61
  9. 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
  10. 2018But How Does It Work in Theory? Linear SVM with Random Featurescited by 28
  11. 2023Error Bounds for Learning with Vector-Valued Random Featurescited by 23
  12. 2021Generalization Bounds for Sparse Random Feature Expansionscited by 22
10 more
  1. 2024Operator Learning Using Random Features: A Tool for Scientific Computingcited by 21
  2. 2021On the Generalization Power of Overfitted Two-Layer Neural Tangent Kernel Modelscited by 13
  3. 2022HARFE: Hard-Ridge Random Feature Expansioncited by 12
  4. 2022Random Feature Models for Learning Interacting Dynamical Systemscited by 10
  5. 2021SHRIMP: Sparser Random Feature Models via Iterative Magnitude Pruningcited by 9
  6. 2022Concentration of Random Feature Matrices in High-Dimensionscited by 8
  7. 2022SRMD: Sparse Random Mode Decompositioncited by 6
  8. 2024Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regressioncited by 5
  9. 2023A Simple and Practical Method for Reducing the Disparate Impact of Differential Privacycited by 4
  10. 2024Personalized Differential Privacy for Ridge Regressioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.