mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward Unifying Group Fairness Evaluation from a Sparsity Perspective

arXiv 2511.00359 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring algorithmic fairness remains a significant challenge in machine learning, particularly as models are increasingly applied across diverse domains. While numerous fairness criteria exist, they often lack generalizability across different machine learning problems. This paper examines the connections and differences among various sparsity measures in promoting fairness and proposes a unified sparsity-based framework for evaluating algorithmic fairness. The framework aligns with existing fairness criteria and demonstrates broad applicability to a wide range of machine learning tasks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework as an evaluation metric through extensive experiments on a variety of datasets and bias mitigation methods. This work provides a novel perspective to algorithmic fairness by framing it through the lens of sparsity and social equity, offering potential for broader impact on fairness research and applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2025.

Builds on

27 of 65 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  5. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  6. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  7. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  8. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  9. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  10. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  11. 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 99
  12. 2019Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvementscited by 70
15 more
  1. 2020FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 52
  2. 2022Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-Processingcited by 50
  3. 2019R'enyi Fair Inferencecited by 33
  4. 2021A Stochastic Optimization Framework for Fair Risk Minimizationcited by 26
  5. 2023Pruning Deep Neural Networks from a Sparsity Perspectivecited by 25
  6. 2021Fairness without Imputation: A Decision Tree Approach for Fair Prediction with Missing Valuescited by 24
  7. 2022Bayes-Optimal Classifiers under Group Fairnesscited by 24
  8. 2022Fair learning with Wasserstein barycenters for non-decomposable performance measurescited by 24
  9. 2020Learning Unbiased Representations via R'enyi Minimizationcited by 18
  10. 2022Beyond Adult and COMPAS: Fairness in Multi-Class Predictioncited by 16
  11. 2022Optimizing generalized Gini indices for fairness in rankingscited by 13
  12. 2020Fast Fair Regression via Efficient Approximations of Mutual Informationcited by 10
  13. 2019Optimized Score Transformation for Consistent Fair Classificationcited by 7
  14. 2024Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regressioncited by 5
  15. 2024FairRR: Pre-Processing for Group Fairness through Randomized Responsecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.