mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

D2PO: Discriminator-Guided DPO with Response Evaluation Models

arXiv 2405.01511 ↗First posted 2 May 2024cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Varied approaches for aligning language models have been proposed, including supervised fine-tuning, RLHF, and direct optimization methods such as DPO. Although DPO has rapidly gained popularity due to its straightforward training process and competitive results, there is an open question of whether there remain practical advantages of using a discriminator, like a reward model, to evaluate responses. We propose D2PO, discriminator-guided DPO, an approach for the online setting where preferences are being collected throughout learning. As we collect gold preferences, we use these not only to train our policy, but to train a discriminative response evaluation model to silver-label even more synthetic data for policy training. We explore this approach across a set of diverse tasks, including a realistic chat setting, we find that our approach leads to higher-quality outputs compared to DPO with the same data budget, and greater efficiency in terms of preference data requirements. Furthermore, we show conditions under which silver labeling is most helpful: it is most effective when training the policy with DPO, outperforming traditional PPO, and benefits from maintaining a separate discriminator from the policy model.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2024.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Human Alignment of Large Language Models through Online Preference Optimisation13 Mar
  2. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  3. 2024Aligning Large Language Models by On-Policy Self-Judgment17 Feb
  4. 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback7 Feb
  5. 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 217 Nov
  6. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  7. 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
  8. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 17

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  6. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  7. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  8. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  9. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 480
  10. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  11. 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 285
  12. 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationscited by 256
5 more
  1. 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 191
  2. 2024Efficient Exploration for LLMscited by 44
  3. 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
  4. 2023Policy Optimization in RLHF: The Impact of Out-of-preference Datacited by 35
  5. 2023The Generalization Gap in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025What Matters in Data for DPO?
  2. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
  3. 2024Towards Analyzing and Understanding the Limitations of DPO: A Theoretical Perspective
  4. 20242D-DPO: Scaling Direct Preference Optimization with 2-Dimensional Supervision
  5. 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
  6. 2025SGPO: Self-Generated Preference Optimization based on Self-Improver
  7. 2024Filtered Direct Preference Optimization
  8. 2025When Data is the Algorithm: A Systematic Study and Curation of Preference Optimization Datasets