D2PO: Discriminator-Guided DPO with Response Evaluation Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Varied approaches for aligning language models have been proposed, including supervised fine-tuning, RLHF, and direct optimization methods such as DPO. Although DPO has rapidly gained popularity due to its straightforward training process and competitive results, there is an open question of whether there remain practical advantages of using a discriminator, like a reward model, to evaluate responses. We propose D2PO, discriminator-guided DPO, an approach for the online setting where preferences are being collected throughout learning. As we collect gold preferences, we use these not only to train our policy, but to train a discriminative response evaluation model to silver-label even more synthetic data for policy training. We explore this approach across a set of diverse tasks, including a realistic chat setting, we find that our approach leads to higher-quality outputs compared to DPO with the same data budget, and greater efficiency in terms of preference data requirements. Furthermore, we show conditions under which silver labeling is most helpful: it is most effective when training the policy with DPO, outperforming traditional PPO, and benefits from maintaining a separate discriminator from the policy model.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2024.
Builds on
25 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Human Alignment of Large Language Models through Online Preference Optimisation13 Mar
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2024Aligning Large Language Models by On-Policy Self-Judgment17 Feb
- 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback7 Feb
- 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 217 Nov
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 17
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 480
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
- 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 285
- 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationscited by 256
5 more
- 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 191
- 2024Efficient Exploration for LLMscited by 44
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
- 2023Policy Optimization in RLHF: The Impact of Out-of-preference Datacited by 35
- 2023The Generalization Gap in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluationcited by 136
- 2024UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicinecited by 67
- 2025Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 53
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 35
- 2025Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Explorationcited by 24
- 2025Why is Your Language Model a Poor Implicit Reward Model?cited by 6
- 2024The Right Time Matters: Data Arrangement Affects Zero-Shot Generalization in Instruction Tuningcited by 4
- 2026DEFT: Distribution-guided Efficient Fine-Tuning for Human Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026PLOT: Enhancing Preference Learning via Optimal Transportcited by 0
- 2026PLOT: Enhancing Preference Learning via Optimal Transport2 Apr 2026
- 2026DEFT: Distribution-guided Efficient Fine-Tuning for Human Alignment2 Apr 2026
- 2025Why is Your Language Model a Poor Implicit Reward Model?10 Jul 2025
- 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation2 Jun 2025
- 2025Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback16 Apr 2025
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization12 Mar 2025
- 2025Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Exploration22 Jan 2025
- 2024The Right Time Matters: Data Arrangement Affects Zero-Shot Generalization in Instruction Tuning17 Jun 2024
- 2024UltraMedical: Building Specialized Generalists in Biomedicine6 Jun 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025What Matters in Data for DPO?
- 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
- 2024Towards Analyzing and Understanding the Limitations of DPO: A Theoretical Perspective
- 20242D-DPO: Scaling Direct Preference Optimization with 2-Dimensional Supervision
- 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
- 2025SGPO: Self-Generated Preference Optimization based on Self-Improver
- 2024Filtered Direct Preference Optimization
- 2025When Data is the Algorithm: A Systematic Study and Curation of Preference Optimization Datasets