mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Right Time Matters: Data Arrangement Affects Zero-Shot Generalization in Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2406.11721 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding alignment techniques begins with comprehending zero-shot generalization brought by instruction tuning, but little of the mechanism has been understood. Existing work has largely been confined to the task level, without considering that tasks are artificially defined and, to LLMs, merely consist of tokens and representations. To bridge this gap, we investigate zero-shot generalization from the perspective of the data itself. We first demonstrate that zero-shot generalization happens very early during instruction tuning, with loss serving as a stable indicator. Next, we investigate training data arrangement through similarity and granularity perspectives, confirming that the timing of exposure to certain training examples may greatly facilitate generalization on unseen tasks. Finally, we propose a more grounded training data arrangement framework, Test-centric Multi-turn Arrangement, and show its effectiveness in promoting continual learning and further loss reduction. For the first time, we show that zero-shot generalization during instruction tuning is a form of similarity-based generalization between training and test data at the instance level. Our code is released at https://github.com/thunlp/Dynamics-of-Zero-Shot-Generalization.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

Builds on

30 of 41 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  7. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  8. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  9. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  10. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  11. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  12. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
18 more
  1. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  2. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 515
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  4. 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 254
  5. 2023OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Datacited by 250
  6. 2022Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Modelscited by 249
  7. 2022OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalizationcited by 235
  8. 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 191
  9. 2020Exploring and Predicting Transferability across NLP Taskscited by 126
  10. 2024Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss Perspectivecited by 94
  11. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
  12. 2018ROUGE 2.0: Updated and Improved Measures for Evaluation of Summarization Taskscited by 66
  13. 2019Deep Model Transferability from Attribution Mapscited by 28
  14. 2023Flacuna: Unleashing the Problem Solving Power of Vicuna using FLAN Fine-Tuningcited by 18
  15. 2019Using Similarity Measures to Select Pretraining Data for NERcited by 15
  16. 2023TaskWeb: Selecting Better Source Tasks for Multi-task NLPcited by 11
  17. 2023Data Similarity is Not Enough to Explain Language Model Performancecited by 9
  18. 2024D2PO: Discriminator-Guided DPO with Response Evaluation Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.