In Anticipation of Perfect Deepfake: Identity-anchored Artifact-agnostic Detection under Rebalanced Deepfake Detection Protocol
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As deep generative models advance, we anticipate deepfakes achieving "perfection"-generating no discernible artifacts or noise. However, current deepfake detectors, intentionally or inadvertently, rely on such artifacts for detection, as they are exclusive to deepfakes and absent in genuine examples. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Rebalanced Deepfake Detection Protocol (RDDP) to stress-test detectors under balanced scenarios where genuine and forged examples bear similar artifacts. We offer two RDDP variants: RDDP-WHITEHAT uses white-hat deepfake algorithms to create 'self-deepfakes,' genuine portrait videos with the resemblance of the underlying identity, yet carry similar artifacts to deepfake videos; RDDP-SURROGATE employs surrogate functions (e.g., Gaussian noise) to process both genuine and forged examples, introducing equivalent noise, thereby sidestepping the need of deepfake algorithms. Towards detecting perfect deepfake videos that aligns with genuine ones, we present ID-Miner, a detector that identifies the puppeteer behind the disguise by focusing on motion over artifacts or appearances. As an identity-based detector, it authenticates videos by comparing them with reference footage. Equipped with the artifact-agnostic loss at frame-level and the identity-anchored loss at video-level, ID-Miner effectively singles out identity signals amidst distracting variations. Extensive experiments comparing ID-Miner with 12 baseline detectors under both conventional and RDDP evaluations with two deepfake datasets, along with additional qualitative studies, affirm the superiority of our method and the necessity for detectors designed to counter perfect deepfakes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2024.
Builds on
39 of 56 references.
References · 39
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
- 2017VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification datasetcited by 732
- 2020First Order Motion Model for Image Animationcited by 704
- 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
27 more
- 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 470
- 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 370
- 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 338
- 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 319
- 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 297
- 2020Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detectioncited by 287
- 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 283
- 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 273
- 2020DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detectioncited by 254
- 2021Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Modelscited by 252
- 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
- 2021WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detectioncited by 209
- 2018Capsule-Forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videoscited by 180
- 2021Audio-Driven Emotional Video Portraitscited by 180
- 2020Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detectioncited by 179
- 2021Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery Detectioncited by 159
- 2021Frequency-aware Discriminative Feature Learning Supervised by Single-Center Loss for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 134
- 2020HeadGAN: One-shot Neural Head Synthesis and Editingcited by 105
- 2020ID-Reveal: Identity-aware DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 97
- 2022Protecting Celebrities from DeepFake with Identity Consistency Transformercited by 95
- 2022FrePGAN: Robust Deepfake Detection Using Frequency-level Perturbationscited by 75
- 2020Detecting Deep-Fake Videos from Appearance and Behaviorcited by 66
- 2022Delving into Sequential Patches for Deepfake Detectioncited by 41
- 2022MobileFaceSwap: A Lightweight Framework for Video Face Swappingcited by 39
- 2022Few-Shot Head Swapping in the Wildcited by 21
- 2021Attack as the Best Defense: Nullifying Image-to-image Translation GANs via Limit-aware Adversarial Attackcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.