mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ruffle&Riley: Insights from Designing and Evaluating a Large Language Model-Based Conversational Tutoring System

arXiv 2404.17460 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational tutoring systems (CTSs) offer learning experiences through interactions based on natural language. They are recognized for promoting cognitive engagement and improving learning outcomes, especially in reasoning tasks. Nonetheless, the cost associated with authoring CTS content is a major obstacle to widespread adoption and to research on effective instructional design. In this paper, we discuss and evaluate a novel type of CTS that leverages recent advances in large language models (LLMs) in two ways: First, the system enables AI-assisted content authoring by inducing an easily editable tutoring script automatically from a lesson text. Second, the system automates the script orchestration in a learning-by-teaching format via two LLM-based agents (Ruffle&Riley) acting as a student and a professor. The system allows for free-form conversations that follow the ITS-typical inner and outer loop structure. We evaluate Ruffle&Riley's ability to support biology lessons in two between-subject online user studies (N = 200) comparing the system to simpler QA chatbots and reading activity. Analyzing system usage patterns, pre/post-test scores and user experience surveys, we find that Ruffle&Riley users report high levels of engagement, understanding and perceive the offered support as helpful. Even though Ruffle&Riley users require more time to complete the activity, we did not find significant differences in short-term learning gains over the reading activity. Our system architecture and user study provide various insights for designers of future CTSs. We further open-source our system to support ongoing research on effective instructional design of LLM-based learning technologies.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2024.

Builds on

3 of 37 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hintscited by 42
  2. 2023Assessing the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions Using GPT-4 and Rule-Based Methodscited by 23
  3. 2023Evaluating ChatGPT's Decimal Skills and Feedback Generation in a Digital Learning Gamecited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 15; 2026: 8.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025MathTutorBench: A Benchmark for Measuring Open-ended Pedagogical Capabilities of LLM Tutorscited by 47
  2. 2025Training LLM-based Tutors to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Dialoguescited by 40
  3. 2025Measuring Agents in Productioncited by 35
  4. 2026Simulated Students in Tutoring Dialogues: Substance or Illusion?cited by 14
  5. 2025TutorGym: A Testbed for Evaluating AI Agents as Tutors and Studentscited by 10
  6. 2024SPL: A Socratic Playground for Learning Powered by Large Language Modelcited by 9
  7. 2025Do LLMs Make Mistakes Like Students? Exploring Natural Alignment between Language Models and Human Error Patternscited by 8
  8. 2025Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English Educationcited by 6
  9. 2025ELI-Why: Evaluating the Pedagogical Utility of Language Model Explanationscited by 4
  10. 2025Pedagogy-driven Evaluation of Generative AI-powered Intelligent Tutoring Systemscited by 4
  11. 2026PATS: Personality-Aware Teaching Strategies with Large Language Model Tutorscited by 4
  12. 2025Improving Student-AI Interaction Through Pedagogical Prompting: An Example in Computer Science Educationcited by 2
13 more
  1. 2026Large Language Models as Students Who Think Aloud: Overly Coherent, Verbose, and Confidentcited by 2
  2. 2024AERA Chat: An Interactive Platform for Automated Explainable Student Answer Assessmentcited by 1
  3. 2025Prompt Programming: A Platform for Dialogue-based Computational Problem Solving with Generative AI Modelscited by 1
  4. 2025From Test-taking to Cognitive Scaffolding: A Pedagogical Diagnostic Benchmark for LLMs on English Standardized Testscited by 1
  5. 2025The Impact of Item-Writing Flaws on Difficulty and Discrimination in Item Response Theorycited by 0
  6. 2025SSRLBot: Designing and Developing a Large Language Model-based Agent using Socially Shared Regulated Learningcited by 0
  7. 2025PAPPL: Personalized AI-Powered Progressive Learning Platformcited by 0
  8. 2025LLM Chatbot-Creation Approachescited by 0
  9. 2026Representation Learning to Study Temporal Dynamics in Tutorial Scaffoldingcited by 0
  10. 2026On-Demand Instructional Material Providing Agent Based on MLLM for Tutoring Supportcited by 0
  11. 2026Interpretable Difficulty-Aware Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialoguescited by 0
  12. 2026Identifying High-Confidence Social Biases in LLMs for Trustworthy Conversational Tutoring Agentscited by 0
  13. 2026From Content Generation to Learning Support: Pedagogy-Guided Generative Video Tutors for STEM Learningcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Ruffle&Riley: Towards the Automated Induction of Conversational Tutoring Systems
  2. 2025Training Turn-by-Turn Verifiers for Dialogue Tutoring Agents: The Curious Case of LLMs as Your Coding Tutors
  3. 2025CoDAE: Adapting Large Language Models for Education via Chain-of-Thought Data Augmentation
  4. 2023Teach AI How to Code: Using Large Language Models as Teachable Agents for Programming Education
  5. 2024TeachTune: Reviewing Pedagogical Agents Against Diverse Student Profiles with Simulated Students
  6. 2025Chrysalis: A Unified System for Comparing Active Teaching and Passive Learning with AI Agents in Education
  7. 2025EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework
  8. 2025Dialogic Pedagogy for Large Language Models: Aligning Conversational AI with Proven Theories of Learning