mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ruffle&Riley: Towards the Automated Induction of Conversational Tutoring Systems

arXiv 2310.01420 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational tutoring systems (CTSs) offer learning experiences driven by natural language interaction. They are known to promote high levels of cognitive engagement and benefit learning outcomes, particularly in reasoning tasks. Nonetheless, the time and cost required to author CTS content is a major obstacle to widespread adoption. In this paper, we introduce a novel type of CTS that leverages the recent advances in large language models (LLMs) in two ways: First, the system induces a tutoring script automatically from a lesson text. Second, the system automates the script orchestration via two LLM-based agents (Ruffle&Riley) with the roles of a student and a professor in a learning-by-teaching format. The system allows a free-form conversation that follows the ITS-typical inner and outer loop structure. In an initial between-subject online user study (N = 100) comparing Ruffle&Riley to simpler QA chatbots and reading activity, we found no significant differences in post-test scores. Nonetheless, in the learning experience survey, Ruffle&Riley users expressed higher ratings of understanding and remembering and further perceived the offered support as more helpful and the conversation as coherent. Our study provides insights for a new generation of scalable CTS technologies.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2023.

Builds on

7 of 66 references.

References · 7

  1. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Pretrained Foundation Models: A History from BERT to ChatGPTcited by 368
  2. 2023CodeHelp: Using Large Language Models with Guardrails for Scalable Support in Programming Classescited by 72
  3. 2023Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hintscited by 43
  4. 2023Assessing the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions Using GPT-4 and Rule-Based Methodscited by 24
  5. 2023Evaluating ChatGPT's Decimal Skills and Feedback Generation in a Digital Learning Gamecited by 19
  6. 2023Using Large Language Models to Provide Explanatory Feedback to Human Tutorscited by 6
  7. 2022Guidelines to Develop Trustworthy Conversational Agents for Childrencited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Ruffle&Riley: Insights from Designing and Evaluating a Large Language Model-Based Conversational Tutoring System
  2. 2025Toward Automated Qualitative Analysis: Leveraging Large Language Models for Tutoring Dialogue Evaluation
  3. 2025Training Turn-by-Turn Verifiers for Dialogue Tutoring Agents: The Curious Case of LLMs as Your Coding Tutors
  4. 2023Strategize Before Teaching: A Conversational Tutoring System with Pedagogy Self-Distillation
  5. 2024Book2Dial: Generating Teacher-Student Interactions from Textbooks for Cost-Effective Development of Educational Chatbots
  6. 2025Training LLM-based Tutors to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Dialogues
  7. 2025Chrysalis: A Unified System for Comparing Active Teaching and Passive Learning with AI Agents in Education
  8. 2026From Tool to Teammate: LLM Coding Agents as Collaborative Partners for Behavioral Labeling in Educational Dialogue Analysis