Coordinated Sparse Recovery of Label Noise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Label noise is a common issue in real-world datasets that inevitably impacts the generalization of models. This study focuses on robust classification tasks where the label noise is instance-dependent. Estimating the transition matrix accurately in this task is challenging, and methods based on sample selection often exhibit confirmation bias to varying degrees. Sparse over-parameterized training (SOP) has been theoretically effective in estimating and recovering label noise, offering a novel solution for noise-label learning. However, this study empirically observes and verifies a technical flaw of SOP: the lack of coordination between model predictions and noise recovery leads to increased generalization error. To address this, we propose a method called Coordinated Sparse Recovery (CSR). CSR introduces a collaboration matrix and confidence weights to coordinate model predictions and noise recovery, reducing error leakage. Based on CSR, this study designs a joint sample selection strategy and constructs a comprehensive and powerful learning framework called CSR+. CSR+ significantly reduces confirmation bias, especially for datasets with more classes and a high proportion of instance-specific noise. Experimental results on simulated and real-world noisy datasets demonstrate that both CSR and CSR+ achieve outstanding performance compared to methods at the same level.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2024.
Builds on
38 of 57 references.
References · 38
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
26 more
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2019Robust Learning with Jacobian Regularizationcited by 127
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
- 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
- 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
- 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 58
- 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
- 2019IMAE for Noise-Robust Learning: Mean Absolute Error Does Not Treat Examples Equally and Gradient Magnitude's Variance Matterscited by 33
- 2020Robust Recovery via Implicit Bias of Discrepant Learning Rates for Double Over-parameterizationcited by 26
- 2021Adaptive Sample Selection for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 20
- 2022Robustness in deep learning: The good (width), the bad (depth), and the ugly (initialization)cited by 18
- 2021Co-Correcting: Noise-tolerant Medical Image Classification via mutual Label Correctioncited by 16
- 2022Scalable Penalized Regression for Noise Detection in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 15
- 2022Benign Overfitting in Classification: Provably Counter Label Noise with Larger Modelscited by 5
- 2023Learning with Noisy Labels through Learnable Weighting and Centroid Similaritycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.