mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Coordinated Sparse Recovery of Label Noise

arXiv 2404.04800 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Label noise is a common issue in real-world datasets that inevitably impacts the generalization of models. This study focuses on robust classification tasks where the label noise is instance-dependent. Estimating the transition matrix accurately in this task is challenging, and methods based on sample selection often exhibit confirmation bias to varying degrees. Sparse over-parameterized training (SOP) has been theoretically effective in estimating and recovering label noise, offering a novel solution for noise-label learning. However, this study empirically observes and verifies a technical flaw of SOP: the lack of coordination between model predictions and noise recovery leads to increased generalization error. To address this, we propose a method called Coordinated Sparse Recovery (CSR). CSR introduces a collaboration matrix and confidence weights to coordinate model predictions and noise recovery, reducing error leakage. Based on CSR, this study designs a joint sample selection strategy and constructs a comprehensive and powerful learning framework called CSR+. CSR+ significantly reduces confirmation bias, especially for datasets with more classes and a high proportion of instance-specific noise. Experimental results on simulated and real-world noisy datasets demonstrate that both CSR and CSR+ achieve outstanding performance compared to methods at the same level.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2024.

Builds on

38 of 57 references.

References · 38

  1. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  2. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  4. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  5. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  6. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  7. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  8. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  9. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  10. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  11. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  12. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
26 more
  1. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  2. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  3. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  4. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  5. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  6. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  7. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  8. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  9. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  10. 2019Robust Learning with Jacobian Regularizationcited by 127
  11. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
  12. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  13. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  14. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  15. 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
  16. 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
  17. 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 58
  18. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  19. 2019IMAE for Noise-Robust Learning: Mean Absolute Error Does Not Treat Examples Equally and Gradient Magnitude's Variance Matterscited by 33
  20. 2020Robust Recovery via Implicit Bias of Discrepant Learning Rates for Double Over-parameterizationcited by 26
  21. 2021Adaptive Sample Selection for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 20
  22. 2022Robustness in deep learning: The good (width), the bad (depth), and the ugly (initialization)cited by 18
  23. 2021Co-Correcting: Noise-tolerant Medical Image Classification via mutual Label Correctioncited by 16
  24. 2022Scalable Penalized Regression for Noise Detection in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 15
  25. 2022Benign Overfitting in Classification: Provably Counter Label Noise with Larger Modelscited by 5
  26. 2023Learning with Noisy Labels through Learnable Weighting and Centroid Similaritycited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.