Is Exploration All You Need? Effective Exploration Characteristics for Transfer in Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In deep reinforcement learning (RL) research, there has been a concerted effort to design more efficient and productive exploration methods while solving sparse-reward problems. These exploration methods often share common principles (e.g., improving diversity) and implementation details (e.g., intrinsic reward). Prior work found that non-stationary Markov decision processes (MDPs) require exploration to efficiently adapt to changes in the environment with online transfer learning. However, the relationship between specific exploration characteristics and effective transfer learning in deep RL has not been characterized. In this work, we seek to understand the relationships between salient exploration characteristics and improved performance and efficiency in transfer learning. We test eleven popular exploration algorithms on a variety of transfer types -- or ``novelties'' -- to identify the characteristics that positively affect online transfer learning. Our analysis shows that some characteristics correlate with improved performance and efficiency across a wide range of transfer tasks, while others only improve transfer performance with respect to specific environment changes. From our analysis, make recommendations about which exploration algorithm characteristics are best suited to specific transfer situations.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.
Builds on
27 of 47 references.
References · 27
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
- 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 734
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
- 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
- 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
15 more
- 2023Minigrid & Miniworld: Modular & Customizable Reinforcement Learning Environments for Goal-Oriented Taskscited by 320
- 2018Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learningcited by 277
- 2020Transfer Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 259
- 2018Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Explorationcited by 240
- 2020Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategiescited by 210
- 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 201
- 2017Parameter Space Noise for Explorationcited by 158
- 2022Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 158
- 2020RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated Environmentscited by 135
- 2018How to Start Training: The Effect of Initialization and Architecturecited by 109
- 2020Intrinsic Reward Driven Imitation Learning via Generative Modelcited by 35
- 2022R'enyi State Entropy for Exploration Acceleration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
- 2022NovGrid: A Flexible Grid World for Evaluating Agent Response to Noveltycited by 14
- 2022Rewarding Episodic Visitation Discrepancy for Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2015Online Transfer Learning in Reinforcement Learning Domainscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.