JAF: Judge Agent Forest
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Judge agents are fundamental to agentic AI frameworks: they provide automated evaluation, and enable iterative self-refinement of reasoning processes. We introduce JAF: Judge Agent Forest, a framework in which the judge agent conducts joint inference across a cohort of query--response pairs generated by a primary agent, rather than evaluating each in isolation. This paradigm elevates the judge from a local evaluator to a holistic learner: by simultaneously assessing related responses, the judge discerns cross-instance patterns and inconsistencies, whose aggregate feedback enables the primary agent to improve by viewing its own outputs through the judge's collective perspective. Conceptually, JAF bridges belief propagation and ensemble-learning principles: overlapping in-context neighborhoods induce a knowledge-graph structure that facilitates propagation of critique, and repeated, randomized evaluations yield a robust ensemble of context-sensitive judgments. JAF can be instantiated entirely via ICL, with the judge prompted for each query using its associated primary-agent response plus a small, possibly noisy set of peer exemplars. While kNN in embedding space is a natural starting point for exemplars, this approach overlooks categorical structure, domain metadata, or nuanced distinctions accessible to modern LLMs. To overcome these limitations, we develop a flexible locality-sensitive hashing (LSH) algorithm that learns informative binary codes by integrating semantic embeddings, LLM-driven hash predicates, supervision from categorical labels, and relevant side information. These hash codes support efficient, interpretable, and relation-aware selection of diverse exemplars, and further optimize exploration of CoT reasoning paths. We validate JAF with an empirical study on the demanding task of cloud misconfigs triage in large-scale cloud environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
26 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 25
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
- 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 301
13 more
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2015Practical and Optimal LSH for Angular Distancecited by 105
- 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 73
- 2019Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)cited by 21
- 2018Scalable Coordinated Exploration in Concurrent Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2023BOMs Away! Inside the Minds of Stakeholders: A Comprehensive Study of Bills of Materials for Software Systemscited by 7
- 2021On out-of-distribution detection with Bayesian neural networkscited by 6
- 2025Auto-Prompt Ensemble for LLM Judgecited by 5
- 2024Is Exploration All You Need? Effective Exploration Characteristics for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2025Conflicting Scores, Confusing Signals: An Empirical Study of Vulnerability Scoring Systemscited by 3
- 2025SGuard-v1: Safety Guardrail for Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024Industry Perception of Security Challenges with Identity Access Management Solutionscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Agent-as-a-Judge
- 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents
- 2026JuryFlow: Disagreement-Guided Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Evaluation
- 2026CARGO: Context-Aware Retrieval-Gated Evaluation of Agentic AI in Production
- 2026AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation
- 2025JudgeBoard: Benchmarking and Enhancing Small Language Models for Reasoning Evaluation
- 2025Auto-Eval Judge: Towards a General Agentic Framework for Task Completion Evaluation
- 2025Table-Critic: A Multi-Agent Framework for Collaborative Criticism and Refinement in Table Reasoning