Uplift Modeling Under Limited Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating causal effects in e-commerce tends to involve costly treatment assignments which can be impractical in large-scale settings. Leveraging machine learning to predict such treatment effects without actual intervention is a standard practice to diminish the risk. However, existing methods for treatment effect prediction tend to rely on training sets of substantial size, which are built from real experiments and are thus inherently risky to create. In this work we propose a graph neural network to diminish the required training set size, relying on graphs that are common in e-commerce data. Specifically, we view the problem as node regression with a restricted number of labeled instances, develop a two-model neural architecture akin to previous causal effect estimators, and test varying message-passing layers for encoding. Furthermore, as an extra step, we combine the model with an acquisition function to guide the creation of the training set in settings with extremely low experimental budget. The framework is flexible since each step can be used separately with other models or treatment policies. The experiments on real large-scale networks indicate a clear advantage of our methodology over the state of the art, which in many cases performs close to random, underlining the need for models that can generalize with limited supervision to reduce experimental risks.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2024.
Builds on
34 of 63 references.
References · 34
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,134
- 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 711
- 2019Neural Graph Collaborative Filteringcited by 660
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
- 2018Universal Sentence Encodercited by 485
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 475
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 408
- 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 327
22 more
- 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 285
- 2021Graph Posterior Network: Bayesian Predictive Uncertainty for Node Classificationcited by 79
- 2023Uncertainty Quantification over Graph with Conformalized Graph Neural Networkscited by 79
- 2017Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effectscited by 76
- 2020CausalML: Python Package for Causal Machine Learningcited by 74
- 2020Accelerating high-throughput virtual screening through molecular pool-based active learningcited by 59
- 2019Learning Individual Causal Effects from Networked Observational Datacited by 56
- 2013Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universescited by 42
- 2021Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation with Networked Observational Datacited by 42
- 2019Active Learning for Graph Neural Networks via Node Feature Propagationcited by 37
- 2020Causal Inference under Networked Interference and Intervention Policy Enhancementcited by 37
- 2019Using Embeddings to Correct for Unobserved Confounding in Networkscited by 31
- 2022Learning Causal Effects on Hypergraphscited by 31
- 2022Using Embeddings for Causal Estimation of Peer Influence in Social Networkscited by 9
- 2020Network experimentation at scalecited by 8
- 2021Maximizing Influence with Graph Neural Networkscited by 8
- 2022Staggered Rollout Designs Enable Causal Inference Under Interference Without Network Knowledgecited by 8
- 2023Estimating Treatment Effects Under Heterogeneous Interferencecited by 6
- 2023Uplift vs. predictive modeling: a theoretical analysiscited by 3
- 2021To do or not to do: cost-sensitive causal decision-makingcited by 2
- 2018Boosting algorithms for uplift modelingcited by 1
- 2023DiffusAL: Coupling Active Learning with Graph Diffusion for Label-Efficient Node Classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026Evaluating Uplift Modeling under Structural Biases: Insights into Metric Stability and Model Robustnesscited by 1
- 2025The Final-Stage Bottleneck: A Systematic Dissection of the R-Learner for Network Causal Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Real vs. Semi-Simulated: Rethinking Evaluation for Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Real vs. Semi-Simulated: Rethinking Evaluation for Treatment Effect Estimation11 May 2026
- 2026Evaluating Uplift Modeling under Structural Biases: Insights into Metric Stability and Model Robustness21 Mar 2026
- 2025The Final-Stage Bottleneck: A Systematic Dissection of the R-Learner for Network Causal Inference17 Nov 2025