The Learnability of Unknown Quantum Measurements
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum machine learning has received significant attention in recent years, and promising progress has been made in the development of quantum algorithms to speed up traditional machine learning tasks. In this work, however, we focus on investigating the information-theoretic upper bounds of sample complexity - how many training samples are sufficient to predict the future behaviour of an unknown target function. This kind of problem is, arguably, one of the most fundamental problems in statistical learning theory and the bounds for practical settings can be completely characterised by a simple measure of complexity. Our main result in the paper is that, for learning an unknown quantum measurement, the upper bound, given by the fat-shattering dimension, is linearly proportional to the dimension of the underlying Hilbert space. Learning an unknown quantum state becomes a dual problem to ours, and as a byproduct, we can recover Aaronson's famous result [Proc. R. Soc. A 463:3089-3144 (2007)] solely using a classical machine learning technique. In addition, other famous complexity measures like covering numbers and Rademacher complexities are derived explicitly. We are able to connect measures of sample complexity with various areas in quantum information science, e.g. quantum state/measurement tomography, quantum state discrimination and quantum random access codes, which may be of independent interest. Lastly, with the assistance of general Bloch-sphere representation, we show that learning quantum measurements/states can be mathematically formulated as a neural network. Consequently, classical ML algorithms can be applied to efficiently accomplish the two quantum learning tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 32
- 2021Generalization in Quantum Machine Learning: a Quantum Information Perspectivecited by 11
- 2021On the Hardness of PAC-learning Stabilizer States with Noisecited by 8
- 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learningcited by 6
- 2024An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testingcited by 5
- 2022A learning theory for quantum photonic processors and beyondcited by 3
- 2024Concept learning of parameterized quantum models from limited measurementscited by 3
- 2022Clifford Circuits can be Properly PAC Learned if and only if textsfRP=textsfNPcited by 1
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classescited by 0
- 2024Concept learning of parameterized quantum models from limited measurements9 Aug 2024
- 2024An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing26 Mar 2024
- 2023Fat Shattering, Joint Measurability, and PAC Learnability of POVM Hypothesis Classes21 Aug 2023
- 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learning8 Jun 2023
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023
- 2022A learning theory for quantum photonic processors and beyond7 Sep 2022
- 2022Clifford Circuits can be Properly PAC Learned if and only if textsfRP=textsfNP13 Apr 2022
- 2021Generalization in Quantum Machine Learning: a Quantum Information Perspective17 Feb 2021
- 2021On the Hardness of PAC-learning Stabilizer States with Noise9 Feb 2021