The Sample Complexity of Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The sample complexity of simple binary hypothesis testing is the smallest number of i.i.d. samples required to distinguish between two distributions p and q in either: (i) the prior-free setting, with type-I error at most α and type-II error at most β; or (ii) the Bayesian setting, with Bayes error at most δ and prior distribution (π, 1-π). This problem has only been studied when α = β (prior-free) or π = 1/2 (Bayesian), and the sample complexity is known to be characterized by the Hellinger divergence between p and q, up to multiplicative constants. In this paper, we derive a formula that characterizes the sample complexity (up to multiplicative constants that are independent of p, q, and all error parameters) for: (i) all 0 ≤ α, β ≤ 1/8 in the prior-free setting; and (ii) all δ ≤ π/4 in the Bayesian setting. In particular, the formula admits equivalent expressions in terms of certain divergences from the Jensen--Shannon and Hellinger families. The main technical result concerns an f-divergence inequality between members of the Jensen--Shannon and Hellinger families, which is proved by a combination of information-theoretic tools and case-by-case analyses. We explore applications of our results to (i) robust hypothesis testing, (ii) distributed (locally-private and communication-constrained) hypothesis testing, (iii) sequential hypothesis testing, and (iv) hypothesis testing with erasures.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2024.
Builds on
6 of 24 references.
References · 6
- 2019Private Hypothesis Selectioncited by 60
- 2015Communication Lower Bounds for Statistical Estimation Problems via a Distributed Data Processing Inequalitycited by 50
- 2018Inference under Information Constraints I: Lower Bounds from Chi-Square Contractioncited by 31
- 2018The Structure of Optimal Private Tests for Simple Hypothesescited by 26
- 2019Inference under Information Constraints II: Communication Constraints and Shared Randomnesscited by 22
- 2022Communication-constrained hypothesis testing: Optimality, robustness, and reverse data processing inequalitiescited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2024Fast Convergence of Phi-Divergence Along the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm and Proximal Samplercited by 11
- 2024Contraction of Private Quantum Channels and Private Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 7
- 2024An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testingcited by 5
- 2024Binary Hypothesis Testing for Softmax Models and Leverage Score Modelscited by 1
- 2025Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discriminationcited by 1
- 2025Bounding Neyman-Pearson Region with f-Divergencescited by 0
- 2025Nearly-Linear Time Private Hypothesis Selection with the Optimal Approximation Factorcited by 0
- 2026Tight Information Complexity of the Coin Problem in the Broadcast Modelcited by 0
- 2026Tight Information Complexity of the Coin Problem in the Broadcast Model3 Aug 2026
- 2025Nearly-Linear Time Private Hypothesis Selection with the Optimal Approximation Factor1 Jun 2025
- 2025Bounding Neyman-Pearson Region with f-Divergences13 May 2025
- 2025Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discrimination17 Apr 2025
- 2024Fast Convergence of Phi-Divergence Along the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm and Proximal Sampler14 Oct 2024
- 2024Contraction of Private Quantum Channels and Private Quantum Hypothesis Testing26 Jun 2024
- 2024Binary Hypothesis Testing for Softmax Models and Leverage Score Models9 May 2024
- 2024An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing26 Mar 2024