mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Survey on Quality Metrics for Text-to-Image Generation

arXiv 2403.11821 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.GRcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI-based text-to-image models do not only excel at generating realistic images, they also give designers more and more fine-grained control over the image content. Consequently, these approaches have gathered increased attention within the computer graphics research community, which has been historically devoted towards traditional rendering techniques, that offer precise control over scene parameters (e.g., objects, materials, and lighting). While the quality of conventionally rendered images is assessed through well established image quality metrics, such as SSIM or PSNR, the unique challenges of text-to-image generation require other, dedicated quality metrics. These metrics must be able to not only measure overall image quality, but also how well images reflect given text prompts, whereby the control of scene and rendering parameters is interweaved. Within this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of such text-to-image quality metrics, and propose a taxonomy to categorize these metrics. Our taxonomy is grounded in the assumption, that there are two main quality criteria, namely compositional quality and general quality, that contribute to the overall image quality. Besides the metrics, this survey covers dedicated text-to-image benchmark datasets, over which the metrics are frequently computed. Finally, we identify limitations and open challenges in the field of text-to-image generation, and derive guidelines for practitioners conducting text-to-image evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 122 of its 157 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

122 of 157 references.

References · 122

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  7. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  8. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  9. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  10. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
  11. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  12. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
38 more
  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  4. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
  5. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  6. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  7. 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,300
  8. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  9. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  10. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  11. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
  12. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
  13. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  14. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  15. 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,305
  16. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
  17. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  18. 2022Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 1,778
  19. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,553
  20. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  21. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,362
  22. 2022Magic3D: High-Resolution Text-to-3D Content Creationcited by 1,290
  23. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
  24. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,216
  25. 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,114
  26. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
  27. 2022Diffusion Models in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,015
  28. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
  29. 2023Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 982
  30. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
  31. 2019VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representationscited by 954
  32. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
  33. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
  34. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
  35. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 766
  36. 2023Attend-and-Excite: Attention-Based Semantic Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 702
  37. 2023Fantasia3D: Disentangling Geometry and Appearance for High-quality Text-to-3D Content Creationcited by 687
  38. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 686

50 most cited of 122 All 122 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 9; 2026: 7.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Text-to-Image Synthesis: A Decade Surveycited by 9
  2. 2025ViStoryBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Story Visualizationcited by 5
  3. 2025MoSa: Motion Generation with Scalable Autoregressive Modelingcited by 5
  4. 2025AMCR: A Framework for Assessing and Mitigating Copyright Risks in Generative Modelscited by 3
  5. 2025CROC: Evaluating and Training T2I Metrics with Pseudo- and Human-Labeled Contrastive Robustness Checkscited by 2
  6. 2025SynCast: Synergizing Contradictions in Precipitation Nowcasting via Diffusion Sequential Preference Optimizationcited by 2
  7. 2026Toward Early Quality Assessment of Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 2
  8. 2024Interactive Visual Assessment for Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 1
  9. 2025DeCoT: Decomposing Complex Instructions for Enhanced Text-to-Image Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 1
  10. 2025Argus: Quality-Aware High-Throughput Text-to-Image Inference Serving Systemcited by 1
  11. 2026Too Vivid to Be Real? Benchmarking and Calibrating Generative Color Fidelitycited by 1
  12. 2026ExpertEdit: Learning Skill-Aware Motion Editing from Expert Videoscited by 1
6 more
  1. 2025Cost Savings from Automatic Quality Assessment of Generated Imagescited by 0
  2. 2025Selecting Fine-Tuning Examples by Quizzing VLMscited by 0
  3. 2026CSEval: A Framework for Evaluating Clinical Semantics in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 0
  4. 2026AME: A Multi-Type Contributor Attribution Framework in Generative AI Marketscited by 0
  5. 2026PortraitGen: Exemplar-Driven GRPO with Dual-Reward Guidance for Photorealistic Portrait Generationcited by 0
  6. 2026VisExMEM: Visual Evidence-Based Explainable Multimodal Evaluation Metriccited by 0