Interactive Visual Assessment for Text-to-Image Generation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual generation models have achieved remarkable progress in computer graphics applications but still face significant challenges in real-world deployment. Current assessment approaches for visual generation tasks typically follow an isolated three-phase framework: test input collection, model output generation, and user assessment. These fashions suffer from fixed coverage, evolving difficulty, and data leakage risks, limiting their effectiveness in comprehensively evaluating increasingly complex generation models. To address these limitations, we propose DyEval, an LLM-powered dynamic interactive visual assessment framework that facilitates collaborative evaluation between humans and generative models for text-to-image systems. DyEval features an intuitive visual interface that enables users to interactively explore and analyze model behaviors, while adaptively generating hierarchical, fine-grained, and diverse textual inputs to continuously probe the capability boundaries of the models based on their feedback. Additionally, to provide interpretable analysis for users to further improve tested models, we develop a contextual reflection module that mines failure triggers of test inputs and reflects model potential failure patterns supporting in-depth analysis using the logical reasoning ability of LLM. Qualitative and quantitative experiments demonstrate that DyEval can effectively help users identify max up to 2.56 times generation failures than conventional methods, and uncover complex and rare failure patterns, such as issues with pronoun generation and specific cultural context generation. Our framework provides valuable insights for improving generative models and has broad implications for advancing the reliability and capabilities of visual generation systems across various domains.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2024.
Builds on
34 of 48 references.
References · 34
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
- 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
- 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
22 more
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
- 2022Compositional Visual Generation with Composable Diffusion Modelscited by 624
- 2023Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 445
- 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 428
- 2022DiffusionDB: A Large-scale Prompt Gallery Dataset for Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 379
- 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 236
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
- 2023Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 171
- 2023Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Modelscited by 160
- 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 156
- 2023AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 142
- 2023HRS-Bench: Holistic, Reliable and Scalable Benchmark for Text-to-Image Modelscited by 95
- 2023LLMScore: Unveiling the Power of Large Language Models in Text-to-Image Synthesis Evaluationcited by 87
- 2024GenAI Arena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Generative Modelscited by 82
- 2023PromptMagician: Interactive Prompt Engineering for Text-to-Image Creationcited by 58
- 2022Discovering Bugs in Vision Models using Off-the-shelf Image Generation and Captioningcited by 45
- 2022Adaptive Testing of Computer Vision Modelscited by 39
- 2023Qualitative Failures of Image Generation Models and Their Application in Detecting Deepfakescited by 31
- 2023X-IQE: eXplainable Image Quality Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation with Visual Large Language Modelscited by 28
- 2023Stable Diffusion is Unstablecited by 27
- 2024GUESS:GradUally Enriching SyntheSis for Text-Driven Human Motion Generationcited by 22
- 2024A Survey on Quality Metrics for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generation
- 2026DynEval: Holistic Evaluations of T2I Generative Models in the Wild
- 2025Thinking-while-Generating: Interleaving Textual Reasoning throughout Visual Generation
- 2026Benchmarking and Evolving Reason-Reflect-Rectify for Reflective Visual Generation
- 2026Visual Generation in the New Era: An Evolution from Atomic Mapping to Agentic World Modeling
- 2026When Does Visual Generation Help Visual Understanding in Unified Multimodal Models?
- 2025Rethinking Prompt Design for Inference-time Scaling in Text-to-Visual Generation
- 2026GenPuzzle: Benchmarking Visual Reasoning in Image Generation Models