AMCR: A Framework for Assessing and Mitigating Copyright Risks in Generative Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative models have achieved impressive results in text to image tasks, significantly advancing visual content creation. However, this progress comes at a cost, as such models rely heavily on large-scale training data and may unintentionally replicate copyrighted elements, creating serious legal and ethical challenges for real-world deployment. To address these concerns, researchers have proposed various strategies to mitigate copyright risks, most of which are prompt based methods that filter or rewrite user inputs to prevent explicit infringement. While effective in handling obvious cases, these approaches often fall short in more subtle situations, where seemingly benign prompts can still lead to infringing outputs. To address these limitations, this paper introduces Assessing and Mitigating Copyright Risks (AMCR), a comprehensive framework which i) builds upon prompt-based strategies by systematically restructuring risky prompts into safe and non-sensitive forms, ii) detects partial infringements through attention-based similarity analysis, and iii) adaptively mitigates risks during generation to reduce copyright violations without compromising image quality. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of AMCR in revealing and mitigating latent copyright risks, offering practical insights and benchmarks for the safer deployment of generative models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2025.
Builds on
46 of 99 references.
References · 46
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2021Palette: Image-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 1,296
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2023Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Modelscited by 723
- 2022Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Modelscited by 418
- 2023Forget-Me-Not: Learning to Forget in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 297
- 2022Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Modelscited by 218
- 2023Understanding and Mitigating Copying in Diffusion Modelscited by 205
- 2022A Self-Supervised Descriptor for Image Copy Detectioncited by 175
- 2023On Provable Copyright Protection for Generative Modelscited by 97
34 more
- 2019FAHT: An Adaptive Fairness-aware Decision Tree Classifiercited by 63
- 2020Artificial Intelligence in the Creative Industries: A Reviewcited by 61
- 2024Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 57
- 2022Generated Faces in the Wild: Quantitative Comparison of Stable Diffusion, Midjourney and DALL-E 2cited by 55
- 2023WOUAF: Weight Modulation for User Attribution and Fingerprinting in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 51
- 2023Evaluating Data Attribution for Text-to-Image Modelscited by 45
- 2021FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifiercited by 37
- 2024History, Development, and Principles of Large Language Models-An Introductory Surveycited by 30
- 2024A Review on Machine Unlearningcited by 30
- 2020Disentangled Dynamic Graph Deep Generationcited by 27
- 2018A Deterministic Self-Organizing Map Approach and its Application on Satellite Data based Cloud Type Classificationcited by 22
- 2022Longitudinal Fairness with Censorshipcited by 21
- 2022Fairness Amidst Non-IID Graph Data: A Literature Reviewcited by 20
- 2024A Survey on Quality Metrics for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 17
- 2023Fair Decision-making Under Uncertaintycited by 15
- 2023Copyright Protection and Accountability of Generative AI:Attack, Watermarking and Attributioncited by 15
- 2024FairAIED: Navigating Fairness, Bias, and Ethics in Educational AI Applicationscited by 15
- 2020Online and Customizable Fairness-aware Learningcited by 14
- 2021Bag of Tricks and A Strong baseline for Image Copy Detectioncited by 14
- 2023Towards Fair Machine Learning Software: Understanding and Addressing Model Bias Through Counterfactual Thinkingcited by 14
- 2024Evaluating and Mitigating IP Infringement in Visual Generative AIcited by 13
- 2021Interpretable Visual Understanding with Cognitive Attention Networkcited by 12
- 2023Preventing Discriminatory Decision-making in Evolving Data Streamscited by 12
- 2023Individual Fairness under Uncertaintycited by 11
- 2024Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explainedcited by 10
- 2025Digital Forensics in the Age of Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Can Large Vision-Language Models Detect Images Copyright Infringement from GenAI?cited by 8
- 2022Incremental Mining of Frequent Serial Episodes Considering Multiple Occurrencescited by 7
- 2024Fairness in Large Language Models in Three Hourscited by 7
- 2025Datasets for Fairness in Language Models: An In-Depth Surveycited by 7
- 2024Tackling Copyright Issues in AI Image Generation Through Originality Estimation and Genericizationcited by 6
- 2023Generative AI and US Intellectual Property Lawcited by 4
- 2024Image Copy Detection for Diffusion Modelscited by 4
- 2024Probabilistic Analysis of Copyright Disputes and Generative AI Safetycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.