mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2310.06958 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.LG cs.MMcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, neural-network-based image- and video-quality metrics perform better than traditional methods. However, they also became more vulnerable to adversarial attacks that increase metrics' scores without improving visual quality. The existing benchmarks of quality metrics compare their performance in terms of correlation with subjective quality and calculation time. Nonetheless, the adversarial robustness of image-quality metrics is also an area worth researching. This paper analyses modern metrics' robustness to different adversarial attacks. We adapted adversarial attacks from computer vision tasks and compared attacks' efficiency against 15 no-reference image- and video-quality metrics. Some metrics showed high resistance to adversarial attacks, which makes their usage in benchmarks safer than vulnerable metrics. The benchmark accepts submissions of new metrics for researchers who want to make their metrics more robust to attacks or to find such metrics for their needs. The latest results can be found online: https://videoprocessing.ai/benchmarks/metrics-robustness.html.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2023.

Builds on

37 of 94 references.

References · 37

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  7. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
  8. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
  9. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  10. 2017Video Enhancement with Task-Oriented Flowcited by 619
  11. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
  12. 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 522
25 more
  1. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
  2. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 389
  3. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
  4. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
  5. 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
  6. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 166
  7. 2019Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videoscited by 164
  8. 2017RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 151
  9. 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
  10. 2022Neural Optimal Transportcited by 126
  11. 2020Unified Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos with Mixed Datasets Trainingcited by 72
  12. 2020Collaborative Learning for Faster StyleGAN Embeddingcited by 65
  13. 2020Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 54
  14. 2019E-LPIPS: Robust Perceptual Image Similarity via Random Transformation Ensemblescited by 45
  15. 2022NTIRE 2022 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 41
  16. 2022Perceptual Attacks of No-Reference Image Quality Models with Human-in-the-Loopcited by 30
  17. 2022Video compression dataset and benchmark of learning-based video-quality metricscited by 27
  18. 2021NTIRE 2021 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 18
  19. 2022Universal Perturbation Attack on Differentiable No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metricscited by 17
  20. 2021Training a Task-Specific Image Reconstruction Losscited by 16
  21. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Hallucinating Pristine Featurescited by 16
  22. 2023Attacking Perceptual Similarity Metricscited by 10
  23. 2019Hacking VMAF with Video Color and Contrast Distortioncited by 8
  24. 2021Hacking VMAF and VMAF NEG: vulnerability to different preprocessing methodscited by 8
  25. 2022Towards True Detail Restoration for Super-Resolution: A Benchmark and a Quality Metriccited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: