mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Trust in Autonomous Agents: An Architecture for Accountability and Explainability through Blockchain and Large Language Models

arXiv 2403.09567 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2024cs.RO cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

The deployment of autonomous agents in environments involving human interaction has increasingly raised security concerns. Consequently, understanding the circumstances behind an event becomes critical, requiring the development of capabilities to justify their behaviors to non-expert users. Such explanations are essential in enhancing trustworthiness and safety, acting as a preventive measure against failures, errors, and misunderstandings. Additionally, they contribute to improving communication, bridging the gap between the agent and the user, thereby improving the effectiveness of their interactions. This work presents an accountability and explainability architecture implemented for ROS-based mobile robots. The proposed solution consists of two main components. Firstly, a black box-like element to provide accountability, featuring anti-tampering properties achieved through blockchain technology. Secondly, a component in charge of generating natural language explanations by harnessing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) over the data contained within the previously mentioned black box. The study evaluates the performance of our solution in three different scenarios, each involving autonomous agent navigation functionalities. This evaluation includes a thorough examination of accountability and explainability metrics, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach in using accountable data from robot actions to obtain coherent, accurate and understandable explanations, even when facing challenges inherent in the use of autonomous agents in real-world scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 42 of its 122 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.

Builds on

42 of 122 references.

References · 42

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  6. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  7. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  8. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  9. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  10. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  11. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  12. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
30 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  2. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 498
  3. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 444
  4. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  5. 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 329
  6. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
  7. 2019Explainable Reinforcement Learning Through a Causal Lenscited by 177
  8. 2023Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentationcited by 146
  9. 2022Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations using Large Language Modelscited by 124
  10. 2023Retrieving Multimodal Information for Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 84
  11. 2023Human Feedback is not Gold Standardcited by 82
  12. 2020The Marathon 2: A Navigation Systemcited by 67
  13. 2019Explainability in Human-Agent Systemscited by 34
  14. 2020Explainable Goal-Driven Agents and Robots -- A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 23
  15. 2020Explainable robotic systems: Understanding goal-driven actions in a reinforcement learning scenariocited by 19
  16. 2023Augmenting LLMs with Knowledge: A survey on hallucination preventioncited by 16
  17. 2021Explainable Autonomous Robots: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 15
  18. 2021Robust and Transferable Anomaly Detection in Log Data using Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 12
  19. 2022Reinforcement Learning and Bandits for Speech and Language Processing: Tutorial, Review and Outlookcited by 10
  20. 2018Towards Providing Explanations for AI Planner Decisionscited by 9
  21. 2023A Closer Look at Reward Decomposition for High-Level Robotic Explanationscited by 7
  22. 2022An Ethical Black Box for Social Robots: a draft Open Standardcited by 5
  23. 2021Cases for Explainable Software Systems:Characteristics and Examplescited by 4
  24. 2023Using Large Language Models for Interpreting Autonomous Robots Behaviorscited by 4
  25. 2019Secure and Transparent Audit Logs with BlockAuditcited by 2
  26. 2020Robot Accident Investigation: a case study in Responsible Roboticscited by 2
  27. 2019Permissionless Blockchains and Secure Loggingcited by 1
  28. 2019A Time-Segmented Consortium Blockchain for Robotic Event Registrationcited by 1
  29. 2019Towards A Robot Explanation System: A Survey and Our Approach to State Summarization, Storage and Querying, and Human Interfacecited by 1
  30. 2020Immutable Log Storage as a Service on Private and Public Blockchainscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Black Box for Agentic Processes: Blockchain-Anchored Evidence for AI Agent Communication, Human Oversight, and GRC Audits
  2. 2025Enabling Regulatory Multi-Agent Collaboration: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions
  3. 2026Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries
  4. 2025BlockA2A: Towards Secure and Verifiable Agent-to-Agent Interoperability
  5. 2026Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directions
  6. 2025Towards Transparent and Incentive-Compatible Collaboration in Decentralized LLM Multi-Agent Systems: A Blockchain-Driven Approach
  7. 2025Decentralized Multi-Agent System with Trust-Aware Communication
  8. 2026Blockchain-Enabled Artificial Intelligence and AI Agents for Secure Data Sharing and Cybersecurity Applications