Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Advances in large language models have enabled agentic AI systems that can reason, plan, and interact with external tools to execute multi-step workflows, while public blockchains have evolved into a programmable substrate for value transfer, access control, and verifiable state transitions. Their convergence introduces a high-stakes systems challenge: designing standard, interoperable, and secure interfaces that allow agents to observe on-chain state, formulate transaction intents, and authorize execution without exposing users, protocols, or organizations to unacceptable security, governance, or economic risks. This survey systematizes the emerging landscape of agent-blockchain interoperability through a systematic literature review, identifying 317 relevant works from an initial pool of over 3000 records. We contribute a five-part taxonomy of integration patterns spanning read-only analytics, simulation and intent generation, delegated execution, autonomous signing, and multi-agent workflows; a threat model tailored to agent-driven transaction pipelines that captures risks ranging from prompt injection and policy misuse to key compromise, adversarial execution dynamics, and multi-agent collusion; and a comparative capability matrix analyzing more than 20 representative systems across 13 dimensions, including custody models, permissioning, policy enforcement, observability, and recovery. Building on the gaps revealed by this analysis, we outline a research roadmap centered on two interface abstractions: a Transaction Intent Schema for portable and unambiguous goal specification, and a Policy Decision Record for auditable, verifiable policy enforcement across execution environments. We conclude by proposing a reproducible evaluation suite and benchmarks for assessing the safety, reliability, and economic robustness of agent-mediated on-chain execution.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 72 of its 352 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.
Builds on
72 of 352 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025A survey of agent interoperability protocols: Model Context Protocol (MCP), Agent Communication Protocol (ACP), Agent-to-Agent Protocol (A2A), and Agent Network Protocol (ANP)4 May
- 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents3 Oct
Other references · 70
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
- 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 568
- 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 520
- 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 450
- 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
- 2023Large Language Models as Tool Makerscited by 293
- 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directionscited by 257
- 2023AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 256
38 more
- 2024Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 221
- 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 218
- 2024AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environmentscited by 215
- 2024ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Callingcited by 204
- 2024Agent Q: Advanced Reasoning and Learning for Autonomous AI Agentscited by 201
- 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 199
- 2023ART: Automatic multi-step reasoning and tool-use for large language modelscited by 193
- 2023Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attackscited by 189
- 2024A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignmentcited by 175
- 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 167
- 2024The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Surveycited by 164
- 2022Holistic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 115
- 2025MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agentscited by 111
- 2018Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart Contractscited by 61
- 2024EasyJailbreak: A Unified Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 57
- 2023Scalable AI Safety via Doubly-Efficient Debatecited by 54
- 2025Multi-Agent Coordination across Diverse Applications: A Surveycited by 37
- 2024Large Language Models as Zero-shot Dialogue State Tracker through Function Callingcited by 34
- 2025AI-Trader: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents in Real-Time Financial Marketscited by 23
- 2025Detecting Proxy Gaming in RL and LLM Alignment via Evaluator Stress Testscited by 19
- 2025Benchmarking Practices in LLM-driven Offensive Security: Testbeds, Metrics, and Experiment Designcited by 13
- 2024Large Language Models for Blockchain Security: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 12
- 2019Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchangescited by 11
- 2019An analysis of Uniswap marketscited by 11
- 2022A Review of zk-SNARKscited by 8
- 2024Honesty to Subterfuge: In-Context Reinforcement Learning Can Make Honest Models Reward Hackcited by 8
- 2018HotStuff: BFT Consensus in the Lens of Blockchaincited by 5
- 2017Witnet: A Decentralized Oracle Network Protocolcited by 4
- 2024Towards Autonomous Agents: Adaptive-planning, Reasoning, and Acting in Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024Maximal Extractable Value in Decentralized Finance: Taxonomy, Detection, and Mitigationcited by 4
- 2018Atomic Cross-Chain Swapscited by 3
- 2020The Istanbul BFT Consensus Algorithmcited by 3
- 2020A Study of Blockchain Oraclescited by 3
- 2022SoK: Preventing Transaction Reordering Manipulations in Decentralized Financecited by 3
- 2020Blockchain Consensus Algorithms: A Surveycited by 2
- 2022Towards a Theory of Maximal Extractable Value I: Constant Function Market Makerscited by 2
- 2023An Automated Vulnerability Detection Framework for Smart Contractscited by 2
- 2023Empirical Review of Smart Contract and DeFi Security: Vulnerability Detection and Automated Repaircited by 2
50 most cited of 70 All 70 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 12.
12 papers.
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commercecited by 8
- 2026AESP: A Human-Sovereign Economic Protocol for AI Agents with Privacy-Preserving Settlementcited by 2
- 2026Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2026PACE: Policy-Attested Contract Execution for Safe AI Agents in Decentralized Financecited by 1
- 2026The Cognitive Penalty: Ablating System 1 and System 2 Reasoning in Edge-Native SLMs for Decentralized Consensuscited by 0
- 2026Is Decentralized AI Governable? From Regulative Policy to Constitutive Protocolcited by 0
- 2026OpenClaw and Ollama in Agentic AI: Toward Fully Autonomous and Scalable AI Agent Systemscited by 0
- 2026ChainClaw: A Layered Agent Framework for Reliable On-Chain Executioncited by 0
- 2026When Agents Act on Web3: An Attack-Surface Survey of MCP, Skills, and Tool Callingcited by 0
- 2026When AI Agents Meet MEV: Cross-Chain Arbitrage in the Agentic Economycited by 0
- 2026Making Duplicate Reimbursement Unrepresentable: A Verified Ethereum E-Invoice System for Humans and AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026SoK: Decentralized Agent Economic Infrastructurecited by 0
- 2026SoK: Decentralized Agent Economic Infrastructure1 Oct 2026
- 2026Making Duplicate Reimbursement Unrepresentable: A Verified Ethereum E-Invoice System for Humans and AI Agents29 Sep 2026
- 2026When AI Agents Meet MEV: Cross-Chain Arbitrage in the Agentic Economy15 Sep 2026
- 2026When Agents Act on Web3: An Attack-Surface Survey of MCP, Skills, and Tool Calling18 Aug 2026
- 2026PACE: Policy-Attested Contract Execution for Safe AI Agents in Decentralized Finance18 Aug 2026
- 2026ChainClaw: A Layered Agent Framework for Reliable On-Chain Execution6 Aug 2026
- 2026Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directions5 Aug 2026
- 2026Is Decentralized AI Governable? From Regulative Policy to Constitutive Protocol23 May 2026
- 2026The Cognitive Penalty: Ablating System 1 and System 2 Reasoning in Edge-Native SLMs for Decentralized Consensus18 Apr 2026
- 2026OpenClaw and Ollama in Agentic AI: Toward Fully Autonomous and Scalable AI Agent Systems16 Apr 2026
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce15 Apr 2026
- 2026AESP: A Human-Sovereign Economic Protocol for AI Agents with Privacy-Preserving Settlement27 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Blockchain-Enabled Artificial Intelligence and AI Agents for Secure Data Sharing and Cybersecurity Applications
- 2026Blockchain and AI: Securing Intelligent Networks for the Future
- 2025A Blockchain-Monitored Agentic AI Architecture for Trusted Perception-Reasoning-Action Pipelines
- 2025BlockA2A: Towards Secure and Verifiable Agent-to-Agent Interoperability
- 2026The Agent Economy: A Blockchain-Based Foundation for Autonomous AI Agents
- 2025Enabling Regulatory Multi-Agent Collaboration: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions
- 2025Fetch.ai: An Architecture for Modern Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Resource-Optimized and Energy-Aware Agentic AI Framework Anchored on Blockchain for Secure Software Supply Chains