mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Black Box for Agentic Processes: Blockchain-Anchored Evidence for AI Agent Communication, Human Oversight, and GRC Audits

arXiv 2609.04017 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026cs.CRcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous AI agents increasingly communicate with other agents, invoke tools, exchange intermediate results, and request human approvals. These workflows create a new auditability problem: organizations must reconstruct what happened, when it happened, which agent or human was involved, which control or policy applied, and whether records were modified afterwards. Motivated by the 2026 OpenAI/Hugging Face incident, this position and architecture paper proposes a product- and vendor-neutral black-box architecture for agentic processes. The architecture creates blockchain-anchored cryptographic commitments for selected agent communications, human-in-the-loop approvals, tool calls, and process artifacts without placing sensitive content on-chain. We define an evidence model that distinguishes temporal anchoring and artifact integrity from event ordering, capture authenticity, authorized anchoring, and causal traceability. The latter properties require additional architectural controls. We then discuss practical use for Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), including compliance testing, risk-based evidence selection, monitoring evidence streams, incident reconstruction, and regulatory reporting readiness under the EU AI Act, NIS2, and the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). This position and architecture paper does not present an empirical performance or security evaluation. The approach does not prevent agent misbehavior or prove semantic truth. Rather, it strengthens the evidentiary basis for later verification of critical process traces.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 2 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

2 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Blockchain-Monitored Agentic AI Architecture for Trusted Perception-Reasoning-Action Pipelines24 Dec
  2. 2025From Cloud-Native to Trust-Native: A Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Systems25 Jul

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries
  2. 2026Trust Is Not a Score: Runtime Assurance Contracts for High-Risk AI Agents
  3. 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
  4. 2024Enhancing Trust in Autonomous Agents: An Architecture for Accountability and Explainability through Blockchain and Large Language Models
  5. 2026Skillsets on the Chain: A Blockchain-based Zero-Trust Framework for Agentic AI Networking
  6. 2026Building Trust in Autonomous Commerce: A Verifiable Global Event Timeline and AI-Ready Fraud Intelligence Layer
  7. 2026Blockchain-Enabled Artificial Intelligence and AI Agents for Secure Data Sharing and Cybersecurity Applications
  8. 2026When Agents Act on Web3: An Attack-Surface Survey of MCP, Skills, and Tool Calling