mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Closer Look at Reward Decomposition for High-Level Robotic Explanations

arXiv 2304.12958 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explaining the behaviour of intelligent agents learned by reinforcement learning (RL) to humans is challenging yet crucial due to their incomprehensible proprioceptive states, variational intermediate goals, and resultant unpredictability. Moreover, one-step explanations for RL agents can be ambiguous as they fail to account for the agent's future behaviour at each transition, adding to the complexity of explaining robot actions. By leveraging abstracted actions that map to task-specific primitives, we avoid explanations on the movement level. To further improve the transparency and explainability of robotic systems, we propose an explainable Q-Map learning framework that combines reward decomposition (RD) with abstracted action spaces, allowing for non-ambiguous and high-level explanations based on object properties in the task. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework through quantitative and qualitative analysis of two robotic scenarios, showcasing visual and textual explanations, from output artefacts of RD explanations, that are easy for humans to comprehend. Additionally, we demonstrate the versatility of integrating these artefacts with large language models (LLMs) for reasoning and interactive querying.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2023.

Builds on

27 of 48 references.

References · 27

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  5. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  6. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  7. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  8. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  9. 2017AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 523
  10. 2016The Option-Critic Architecturecited by 448
  11. 2020Transporter Networks: Rearranging the Visual World for Robotic Manipulationcited by 344
  12. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 290
15 more
  1. 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 267
  2. 2018Visual Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Goalscited by 251
  3. 2017Visualizing and Understanding Atari Agentscited by 141
  4. 2018Learning Synergies between Pushing and Grasping with Self-supervised Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 128
  5. 2017Robotic Pick-and-Place of Novel Objects in Clutter with Multi-Affordance Grasping and Cross-Domain Image Matchingcited by 125
  6. 2015Benchmarking in Manipulation Research: The YCB Object and Model Set and Benchmarking Protocolscited by 99
  7. 2020Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 97
  8. 2021Q-attention: Enabling Efficient Learning for Vision-based Robotic Manipulationcited by 85
  9. 2021Augmenting Reinforcement Learning with Behavior Primitives for Diverse Manipulation Taskscited by 78
  10. 2022Multi-skill Mobile Manipulation for Object Rearrangementcited by 46
  11. 2023Chat with the Environment: Interactive Multimodal Perception Using Large Language Modelscited by 43
  12. 2018Transparency and Explanation in Deep Reinforcement Learning Neural Networkscited by 40
  13. 2022Rethinking Sim2Real: Lower Fidelity Simulation Leads to Higher Sim2Real Transfer in Navigationcited by 30
  14. 2020Explainable Goal-Driven Agents and Robots -- A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 24
  15. 2018Towards Better Interpretability in Deep Q-Networkscited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Decisions that Explain Themselves: A User-Centric Deep Reinforcement Learning Explanation System
  2. 2025Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Temporal Policy Decomposition
  3. 2023Explainable Reinforcement Learning via a Causal World Model
  4. 2023Understanding Your Agent: Leveraging Large Language Models for Behavior Explanation
  5. 2025A Survey of Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Targets, Methods and Needs
  6. 2025Explainable Reinforcement Learning Agents Using World Models
  7. 2023Explaining RL Decisions with Trajectories
  8. 2025TalkToAgent: A Human-centric Explanation of Reinforcement Learning Agents with Large Language Models