Did Translation Models Get More Robust Without Anyone Even Noticing?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural machine translation (MT) models achieve strong results across a variety of settings, but it is widely believed that they are highly sensitive to "noisy" inputs, such as spelling errors, abbreviations, and other formatting issues. In this paper, we revisit this insight in light of recent multilingual MT models and large language models (LLMs) applied to machine translation. Somewhat surprisingly, we show through controlled experiments that these models are far more robust to many kinds of noise than previous models, even when they perform similarly on clean data. This is notable because, even though LLMs have more parameters and more complex training processes than past models, none of the open ones we consider use any techniques specifically designed to encourage robustness. Next, we show that similar trends hold for social media translation experiments -- LLMs are more robust to social media text. We include an analysis of the circumstances in which source correction techniques can be used to mitigate the effects of noise. Altogether, we show that robustness to many types of noise has increased.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.
Builds on
30 of 54 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
- 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
- 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 348
18 more
- 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 306
- 2023Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languagescited by 214
- 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
- 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 206
- 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 203
- 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLPcited by 132
- 2020The Tatoeba Translation Challenge -- Realistic Data Sets for Low Resource and Multilingual MTcited by 128
- 2018On Adversarial Examples for Character-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 85
- 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
- 2018MTNT: A Testbed for Machine Translation of Noisy Textcited by 54
- 2019Training on Synthetic Noise Improves Robustness to Natural Noise in Machine Translationcited by 52
- 2023Steering Large Language Models for Machine Translation with Finetuning and In-Context Learningcited by 49
- 2021Robust Open-Vocabulary Translation from Visual Text Representationscited by 47
- 2019Improving Robustness of Machine Translation with Synthetic Noisecited by 36
- 2020NeuSpell: A Neural Spelling Correction Toolkitcited by 32
- 2023Unnatural Error Correction: GPT-4 Can Almost Perfectly Handle Unnatural Scrambled Textcited by 19
- 2019An Analysis of Source-Side Grammatical Errors in NMTcited by 6
- 2020Adversarial Subword Regularization for Robust Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translationcited by 8
- 2025From TOWER to SPIRE: Adding the Speech Modality to a Translation-Specialist LLMcited by 8
- 2025From SALAMANDRA to SALAMANDRATA: BSC Submission for WMT25 General Machine Translation Shared Taskcited by 3
- 2025Translation Analytics for Freelancers: I. Introduction, Data Preparation, Baseline Evaluationscited by 2
- 2025How Important is `Perfect' English for Machine Translation Prompts?cited by 2
- 2024MT-LENS: An all-in-one Toolkit for Better Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 0
- 2025When the Gold Standard Isn't Necessarily Standard: Challenges of Evaluating the Translation of User-Generated Contentcited by 0
- 2026Pre-Editorial Normalization for Automatically Transcribed Medieval Manuscripts in Old French and Latincited by 0
- 2026Translation as a Computationally Efficient Bridge: Feasibility of English BERT for Low-Resource Languagescited by 0
- 2026Translation as a Computationally Efficient Bridge: Feasibility of English BERT for Low-Resource Languages14 Jul 2026
- 2026Pre-Editorial Normalization for Automatically Transcribed Medieval Manuscripts in Old French and Latin14 Feb 2026
- 2025When the Gold Standard Isn't Necessarily Standard: Challenges of Evaluating the Translation of User-Generated Content19 Dec 2025
- 2025From SALAMANDRA to SALAMANDRATA: BSC Submission for WMT25 General Machine Translation Shared Task18 Aug 2025
- 2025How Important is `Perfect' English for Machine Translation Prompts?13 Jul 2025
- 2025Translation Analytics for Freelancers: I. Introduction, Data Preparation, Baseline Evaluations20 Apr 2025
- 2025From TOWER to SPIRE: Adding the Speech Modality to a Translation-Specialist LLM13 Mar 2025
- 2024MT-LENS: An all-in-one Toolkit for Better Machine Translation Evaluation16 Dec 2024
- 2024Modeling User Preferences with Automatic Metrics: Creating a High-Quality Preference Dataset for Machine Translation10 Oct 2024